Author Topic: Proposal to change extension method  (Read 4922 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jmtrops

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5187
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2019, 10:46:38 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline -BA-

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5787
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2019, 10:51:39 AM »
I think this sounds great, we may need a need to work our a few minor details like what Jim stated, but I like it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5153
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2019, 10:54:30 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.
:iatp: I am in favour but let's not stampede into it for sure. Maybe push it a year.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2019, 10:57:17 AM »
But if you want something really solid take the average of the best two of the last three years. Seems like something Excel can handle.

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jmtrops

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5187
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2019, 11:08:30 AM »
I can adjust ok if I resign a bunch of the now but I would like to have an exception for the resign rule that if you resign early the value can not be lower than its current value. I have 2 of them, one would go from 4.8M to 4M and the other would go from 3.6M to 2.7M. doing these it will cut down my cap this year to 4.1M and will make me under the cap next year under the new system.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19203
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2019, 11:29:09 AM »
Yes which is why an average of the last 3 years is best.

It doesn't make sense.  If a young player gets to appear in 20 games in his first year and struggles to produce, but then pops in his second year and puts up good numbers - his renewal shouldn't be an average of those 2 seasons, it should be based on his 2nd season. The numbers would be just plain silly.  Sure, there's outliers in the best of 2 year thing - but all in all it works out pretty well.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5153
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2019, 11:32:35 AM »
It doesn't make sense.  If a young player gets to appear in 20 games in his first year and struggles to produce, but then pops in his second year and puts up good numbers - his renewal shouldn't be an average of those 2 seasons, it should be based on his 2nd season. The numbers would be just plain silly.  Sure, there's outliers in the best of 2 year thing - but all in all it works out pretty well.
Already addressed that Rob. I'm at yes on your changes....have an open mind.

Quote
Use the greater of the two values for rookies that will be signed to prospect discounts, but the average for extension values.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5153
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2019, 11:33:22 AM »
Also the top 25 extension value example posted looks based on 2018-19 only and not the best of the two years. I've done an average of the same players for the last two years but can't get my chart to drop in nicely. Would love to see one of you excel wizards chart a weighted average for the last three years (avg of best two). My facility with excel is middling but I can manage it if I have to.       
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19203
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2019, 11:36:12 AM »
ok so here is the down side. Im a team that wont make the playoffs this coming year and I will have 10 players to resign at the end of the year and assuming the prospect discount dont change I will be 3.6M over the cap. the biggest reason for this is I traded cap space this year and next year, 10M next year based on our current extension prices (which I would have 8.8M in cap space). this is the problem with these type of changes is 1 season is not enough time for me to adjust. Im not a top 3 team and struggle just to make the playoffs. Im still in favor of this change but if we had talked about this 1 month ago I would not have just traded 10M cap space for next year. and I might be the only one in this situation but everyone should apply this to there team and see what happens to there cap next year. if a lot of teams are going to be in the same cap problem as me then Im good with having to make what ever adjustments needed but if there are only 3 of us then maybe a compromise is needed for the transition.

Jim - could you do the math to tell me what your total cap hit would be if you extended all of your players under the current rules vs the cap hit extending all your players under the new rules?

I'd then like to compare you with a few of the top teams.  I have a feeling they will suffer more than you.  And if that's the case, then I'm still OK putting you all through this right away.  If we find there's a discrepancy and teams like yours suffer more than those at the top, then I might agree with your subsequent idea of allowing extensions now without the rule of matching the existing contract value - to let teams like yours get adjusted.

I'll run some numbers on a few other teams as well. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19203
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal to change extension method
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2019, 11:38:12 AM »
Also the top 25 extension value example posted looks based on 2018-19 only and not the best of the two years. I've done an average of the same players for the last two years but can't get my chart to drop in nicely. Would love to see one of you excel wizards chart a weighted average for the last three years (avg of best two). My facility with excel is middling but I can manage it if I have to.    

That's one thing I forgot to point out - all of my extension values for comparisons sake are from 18/19 only.  I didn't feel like pulling prior numbers :/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    May 04, 2024, 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Yesterday at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Yesterday at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Yesterday at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Yesterday at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Yesterday at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Yesterday at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Yesterday at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Yesterday at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Yesterday at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Yesterday at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Yesterday at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Yesterday at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Yesterday at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Yesterday at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Yesterday at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Yesterday at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Yesterday at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Yesterday at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Yesterday at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Yesterday at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Yesterday at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Yesterday at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Yesterday at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Yesterday at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Yesterday at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Yesterday at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Yesterday at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Yesterday at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Yesterday at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Yesterday at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Yesterday at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Yesterday at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Yesterday at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Yesterday at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Yesterday at 08:22:38 PM
  • Daddy: Big ol NFL LIVE trade to get the day started on a Monday.
    Today at 11:03:41 AM
  • Daddy: Congratulations to both GMs
    Today at 11:03:58 AM
  • Daddy: If anyone didnt know.. The Philadelphia Phillies are good at baseball :)
    Today at 11:14:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Dave w pm
    Today at 03:10:22 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: FGM is looking for a GM.  If you are interested, please PM me
    Today at 04:35:04 PM
  • Daddy: If i weren't so busy i would take it. FGM is a great league well run.
    Today at 04:38:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Today at 05:08:40 PM