Here you go. Current goalie salaries in the NHL with some artistic liberties used to create a more gradual decline in compensation. multiplied by 1.30 (30%) as an added value adjustment.
I also added in defense with a 30% decrease so people could see what it looks like. I can easily play with the percentages to see what the increase and decreases would look like.
I think if you are going to increase goalie extensions you almost have to decrease the defense so teams can still afford to field a full roster.
i personally
like the goalie extensions you've proposed.
however, i am
not on the same pg for defense extensions needing a decrease... my reasons
- defense is a huge player pool
- in FNHL we start 6 defensemen (versus 3 of each FWD position)
- a team that's suddenly able to start 6 stud D because they are cheaper
might have a competitive advantage.
it's kinda what i have in my CBS money league where D scoring is heavily weighted and owning Erik Karlsson or a healthy Mike Green or Kris Letang means you can kick butt all season.
anyway, the main objective of increasing Goalie extensions is to force teams to decide whether it's worth it to keep a 2nd starting G they can only use sparingly with 1 active goalie spot (starting in 2013-14) versus trading that 2nd G for a stud FWD that can be easily started nightly. bottomline, we just want goalie rich teams to share the goalie love in such a deep league.
it's that or push the RESET BUTTON, scrap the league because it's too polarized with a handful of goalie rich teams while others wallow in mediocrity never having a real chance at going deep in the playoffs.
i'm not saying "no" as commish to decreasing extensions for Defensemen... that's just my input on that topic.