Author Topic: Rule Change: Contract Options  (Read 339 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EastCoastGonzo

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 6118
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Rule Change: Contract Options
« on: February 12, 2022, 03:12:44 PM »
Currently we have straight contract of 1 - 5 years for MLB, this would introduce the ability to give a club-option on a FA contract.

Rule Change:

The General Manager may include an option year on any contract. A team option can only be 1 year and is worth the same amount as the yearly salary. If an option is declined the buyout cost is 33% of the contract year.

Example, :SF: signed SP Anthony DeSclafani to a 3 yr / $19,069,000 with a 4th year option. That 4th year is worth $19,069,000, if it is declined :SF: takes a $6,292,770 cap hit.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2022, 03:19:19 PM by EastCoastGonzo »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9966
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change: Contract Options
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2022, 09:41:03 PM »
I would like to make some points about options

1) Options need to be valued lower because they are not guaranteed.  A team who offers a 2 yr contact with an option should be less valuable than a 3 yr contact.

2) If you're going to do a team option you should also do a player option as well.  Not sure if that's what is meant by the opt out, but they're generally different.  Also, I think if you're going to do options, we should consider the vesting option, which is based on playing time.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

Offline Brent

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 15350
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NO:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LouisianaState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change: Contract Options
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2022, 09:10:31 AM »
The whole point in an option is whether or not to pick it up or not.  If it's not picked up then it should be $0 cap hit and the player becomes a FA. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SEA: 2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
:NOP: 2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
:NO: 2021-2022 NFL Live -  30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
:NO: 2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!

Offline EastCoastGonzo

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 6118
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change: Contract Options
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2022, 04:03:03 PM »
I would like to make some points about options

1) Options need to be valued lower because they are not guaranteed.  A team who offers a 2 yr contact with an option should be less valuable than a 3 yr contact.

2) If you're going to do a team option you should also do a player option as well.  Not sure if that's what is meant by the opt out, but they're generally different.  Also, I think if you're going to do options, we should consider the vesting option, which is based on playing time.

1. Completely agree. A guaranteed contract would always beat a contract with an option when it came to FA bidding.

2. I would say it's difficult to do a player option since we don't have real players, but I guess you could flip this mechanic. So if the player finishes in a certain percentile then they exercise their option, though that is almost more of a vesting option. But I'm not sure there would be a benefit for GM's to give a player option in our structure.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline EastCoastGonzo

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 6118
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change: Contract Options
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2022, 04:04:31 PM »
The whole point in an option is whether or not to pick it up or not.  If it's not picked up then it should be $0 cap hit and the player becomes a FA.

In MLB a team option almost always comes with a buyout if its declined and that buyout is always guaranteed.
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
ldsjayhawk,
No reactions

Offline indiansnation

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 20763
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CLE-NFL:
    • :CLE-NBA:
    • :CLS:
    • :OhioState:
    • :CLS-MLS:
    • :CLE:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change: Contract Options
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2022, 01:48:04 PM »
I agree with eastcoast.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Today at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Today at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Today at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Today at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Today at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Today at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Today at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Today at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Today at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Today at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Today at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Today at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Today at 06:21:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I could teach how I did what I did
    Today at 07:33:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: ill be around for a few hours today. Wont be around tomorrow until late
    Today at 07:37:07 PM
  • TheGOAT: Thank God that there are 3 really good qb options in the draft. Can't imagine a world with Bo Nix as my frachise qb
    Today at 08:12:51 PM
  • TheGOAT: Not that hes bad
    Today at 08:13:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: think rn my qb room is minshew dobbs wentz
    Today at 08:22:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: We look forward to your return to the playoffs @Thegoat
    Today at 08:22:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You and your brother camw in guns blazing a few years back. The NFC is not the gauntlet the AFC is. Once you make the title game, all bets are off
    Today at 08:23:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nfc is still tough
    Today at 08:25:23 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i had a tough road
    Today at 08:25:37 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: to get to teh ship lot of good teams i knocked out
    Today at 08:25:50 PM