Author Topic: Milwaukee/Washington Deal  (Read 1160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RyanJames5

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 9795
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BAL-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :NorthCarolina:
    • :COL-MLS:
    • :BAL:
    • View Profile
Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« on: December 18, 2019, 11:03:33 AM »
:MIL-NBA2: Recieved:
PG Jordan Clarkson $7.0(2020)
PG Reggie Jackson .5(2021)
2021 2nd round pick :WAS-NBA2: (via :VAN-NBA: )

:WAS-NBA2: Recieved:
SFChandler Hutchison $1.7(2021)
PF Taj Gibson $0.5(2021)
:MIL-NBA:  2020 1st Round Pick

Washington makes this deal for the same reasons we make the previous deal.  Clarkson was picked up so we could move up in the first round and while he has been solid, he's not a long term part of the plan.  Hutchison and the first next year, even likely being later in the draft, as well as the savings from Clarkson's contract allow me to pick up another couple young pieces and more freedom in free agency.  Thanks and good luck to Milwaukee
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:STL: 2022 FGM Champions
:NYY: 2022 Armchair Champions
:LAA: 2021 Wild Card 2 Champions
:PIT: 2015 Wild Card Baseball World Series Champions

Offline WizKidFromSpace

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 310
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :TEN:
    • :DEN-NBA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2019, 11:28:37 AM »
I'm pretty curious what Bucks think they're getting out of this.. That Clarkson contract honestly isn't good considering he's a very mild contributor (could probably match his production for pennies on the dollar in FA). Bucks 1st rounder will be low, but the 2nd rounder they get back may well be the last pick in the draft. I hope Clarkson is the final piece to Bucks' exodia because it feels like Wizards are running away with a 1st round pick and salary dump.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cloud91

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3641
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :ANA:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2019, 08:35:07 PM »
:MIL-NBA:  confirms, 1 of 3 of my main PG is down so i need another 1 that can contribute and im being highly bias :rool: on clarkson because hes my countryman lol and i like him, and to answer some of WizKidFromSpace questions, is my 1st rounder a overprice part of this i guess not for me it will be a late mid pick in real life NBA draft and with reggie jackson part of this trade i guess its fine, and is it really a big salary dump? for me, no.  i eat 5m  its just small for me.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:ANA: Title Town: NHL   :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2017-'18 Season
:PIT-NHL: King Of The Rink (NHL Yahoo GM) :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2014-'15 Season

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2019, 09:04:43 PM »
Isn't Clarkson just an American? He was born in Tampa, FL on quick look-up.

I agree with what WizKid said. All of it. But...
While the trade isn't one I would necessarily do - based on the fact VanVleet is back in action this week and Clarkson is way overpaid, and as Wiz pointed out you could get similar production from FA for much cheaper (Patty Mills was just signed in FA, who is pretty well averaging the same stats as Clarkson but on the min. salary), it isn't a severe knock to the MIL franchise overall by any means. MIL eats an extra $5.3m in cap for some depth PG players and gives up a 1st Rounder.

Expensive price to pay? Yeah. But if the season ended today the 1st Rounder would be a non-lottery pick.
Clarkson's deal is done next year and MIL has a full roster next year as it is, so cap isn't a huge issue if Cloud is content with keeping the same roster.
Not sure if Cloud overlooked it, but Hutchinson can be put in the D-League to save cap, and then also just released for free after this season so there is no buy-out penalty for him (just wouldn't pick up his Team Option, so it's a free drop).

Again, I think it's pretty clear Washington is the winner here for a number of reasons, but it's not so terrible it's a veto-able trade. I don't see MIL losing all their remaining match-ups and the pick ending up being 5th overall or something like that.

I'll :iatp:
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 09:12:18 PM by WestCoastExpress »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cloud91

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3641
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :ANA:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2019, 09:41:19 PM »
Isn't Clarkson just an American? He was born in Tampa, FL on quick look-up.

nope, he played also for my country  :thumbsup:


and did i overlooked Hutchinson? no, i just lost interest on him plain and simple.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:ANA: Title Town: NHL   :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2017-'18 Season
:PIT-NHL: King Of The Rink (NHL Yahoo GM) :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2014-'15 Season

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2019, 09:46:06 PM »
nope, he played also for my country  :thumbsup:

and did i overlooked Hutchinson? no, i just lost interest on him plain and simple.

Oh, very cool.


Fair enough. I've overpaid for my fair share of hometown players or favourite players in several fantasy leagues.

Like I said, it isn't going to hurt the MIL franchise in the long run given the state of their team so there is no problem with the trade for me.

Plus I've known cloud on this site for years and he is in here for the long run, it's not like this is a new GM making his first trade in this league with the possibility of leaving next week

 :toth:
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 09:48:23 PM by WestCoastExpress »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline WizKidFromSpace

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 310
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :TEN:
    • :DEN-NBA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2019, 10:01:43 PM »
:MIL-NBA:  confirms, 1 of 3 of my main PG is down so i need another 1 that can contribute and im being highly bias :rool: on clarkson because hes my countryman lol and i like him, and to answer some of WizKidFromSpace questions, is my 1st rounder a overprice part of this i guess not for me it will be a late mid pick in real life NBA draft and with reggie jackson part of this trade i guess its fine, and is it really a big salary dump? for me, no.  i eat 5m  its just small for me.

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2019, 11:01:37 PM »
To me not too bad a deal as some others might think. I also like Clarkson and wouldn't mind paying a 1st (I just don't have 1). Clarkson putting up better production than any FA in my opinion and could get traded .

Plus 2 good GMs and each happy with deal so  easy :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline IndianaBuc

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 2953
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :TB:
    • :OKC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Nebraska:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2019, 05:12:33 AM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Milwaukee/Washington Deal
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2019, 11:13:59 AM »
Trade passes, let me know which roster to place everyone
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Today at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Today at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Today at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Today at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Today at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Today at 03:48:17 PM