0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
That is why I suggested putting all the IR players on their own roster, just like what we do for the minors. And just like the minor roster page, it can be set up to not affect the match-ups. On top of that, it will be easier to keep track of who is getting off of IR; just check the IR Roster page. At most, the roster will have 54 players (3 IR spots per team) as opposed to the minor roster pages, which could have up to 180 players (30 minors per team in the division) each.
I think the IR roster would work the best. Only thing is that players that are injured if they are on your roster aren't accumulating you points if they are on your roster. And they are suppose to be removed with 48 hours (I believe) or else they receive penalties. But if the league wishes to do this, it is a simple add and will only put us at the 24 teams on fantrax so it won't push us to be paid. Let me know what you like.I will also be back to business this week getting everything here at ProFSL up to date!
The thing that bothers me is the fact that a team can start the player on ir while they have another player filling in for them. What happens if the player unexpectly returns and you have both him and the ir replacement active and a game has been played for the day? Now you are receiving points for a player that you should not have access to.
Should we have another conversation on goalies? After looking through all the rosters, you can definitely see a huge difference between the top of the league and the bottom of the league in regards to goalie ownership. I know I was a huge advocate in not going below 4 goalies, but maybe I was wrong. What if we went to 3 goalies per team next season? With a total of 60 goalie jobs in the NHL available per season, I think it is preposterous for our league to have more slots available then there are actual goalies in the NHL.With our current set up, we have a total of 72 goalie slots available. That is 12 more slots then actual NHL jobs. If we cut it to 3 goalies per team, we would have a total of 54 goalie slots. That is 6 less slots then actual NHL jobs. We might even have more FA goalies available when a goalie gets injured!I feel a move like this is needed in order to help create parity in the league. A move like this will not punish a team that has traded or drafted well, because that team can move one of their excess goalies for a pretty solid bounty. When a young goalie on your team has finally earned the starter position or has proven to be a solid back up, you can always move one of your other goalies to make room for him.I really enjoy the competitive atmosphere in the league, but I find it can be a little disheartening when teams are saying right now "I don't see me winning this year, so I am going to start selling" and the trade deadline is more then a month away. And I feel that lowering the goalie limit to 3 will help with this.
I don't like having to much info on the web so everyone can see it
Nobody will ever know your name.
