Suggestion Box

[nelly85]

I like the whole idea of the rfas and I like the idea only draftes aloud 1 way contracts I also think we should include conditional picks as for trades

[Drew]

Everything would run as normal for extensions.
2 ways would be eligible as normal for players with under 40 games players.
I like the two period process but only thing is rfa would probably be after but at the same time would be more realistic.

But if league is down for it we would discuss details after.

[Tony]

2. Backyard Hall of Fame - 1 GM maximum will be inducted at conclusion of each year. 80% of league approval would be required. If more than 1 GM is nominated then the GM with the highest approval rate would be inducted with over 80%. Must have 1 year time served to be nominated. Other stipulations could be discussed as well.

This could be fun.  Maybe it should be done every 2nd year or so?  Not sure what others think about it.  Would we do our first inductee this off-season?



LETS ALSO GET RID OF THE +/-.   

[favo_zomg]

Everything would run as normal for extensions.
2 ways would be eligible as normal for players with under 40 games players.
I like the two period process but only thing is rfa would probably be after but at the same time would be more realistic.

But if league is down for it we would discuss details after.

At the same time would be more realistic, but having two separate free agency periods would make your job a lot easier.

[yahoolando]

Everything would run as normal for extensions.
2 ways would be eligible as normal for players with under 40 games players.
I like the two period process but only thing is rfa would probably be after but at the same time would be more realistic.

But if league is down for it we would discuss details after.

2 ways have to stay as it makes for a realistic environment with the 40 GP stipulation

[yahoolando]

I agree with Drew as the RFA thing wouldn't be that hard to track as we would do RFA's after FAs so if anyone was left to RFA then it would only be a handful of players.

So for example this past offseason it would have been done during the Amnesty Buyout Period after FAs were signed.

 

[Tyler]

I think both are cool ideas and would add a lot to the league. I think RFA is a cool idea and can be simple yet fun to be able to match some 2 way guys or at least get a small compensation when losing then

[Drew]

I would prefer to have RFA and FA periods at the same time because I don't like the saving of cap for RFAs and I want it to be more realistic.

[favo_zomg]

I would prefer to have RFA and FA periods at the same time because I don't like the saving of cap for RFAs and I want it to be more realistic.

Than a list would be the best thing to do. When a player opens a forum for an RFA, the player posting the forum needs to mention that the player is an RFA in the Subject so everyone else knows there will be a payment for said player. If a player does not know if the player is an RFA, all they have to do is simply consult the list.

Thoughts?

And how about we compensate owners in regards to the length the RFA has been signed. For example:

1 year contract - 4th round pick
2 year contract - 3rd round pick
3 year contract - 3rd and 4th round pick
4 year contract - 2nd and 4th round pick

I hate to see a team lose their first round pick to RFA, especially teams in the middle of rebuilding like New York, Dallas, and Minnesota. I think this compensation package will be good for everyone.

Thoughts?

[Eric]

You could also base RFA compensation based on how they rank pointa wise. On my phone right now so can't get example but like top 10%  would be type and next 10% type b etc or something along those lines.