Author Topic: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation  (Read 2872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« on: June 16, 2011, 06:50:37 PM »
Quote
I'm confused... so if someone signs their prospect to an extension, the extension kicks in following the end of his prospect eligibility, or the following year... cause if that is the case take the extension off of Ike until this is sorted out. I didn't foresee this becoming an issue when he was signed.

My take on it, if you want the full percentage then you take it that year. You want the player signed for the following year you take the following years percentage. For instance, Ike again. Signed this year it is 60%, if I want the contract to take hold next year, then it should be 50%, so on and so forth. I think this needs to be discussed further

That was Dan... my thinking is that the percentage is based on the period the contract is awarded, not started.  This is consistent with other approaches.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 07:17:34 PM »
Where the rub lies now, is that we voted you can sign a guy at the end of his final eligibility season and have it take hold the following year. So since that is already in effect, we might need to have all prospect extensions begin the following season, just to be consistent.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2011, 07:31:10 PM »
Where the rub lies now, is that we voted you can sign a guy at the end of his final eligibility season and have it take hold the following year. So since that is already in effect, we might need to have all prospect extensions begin the following season, just to be consistent.

This was established in the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2011, 07:38:56 PM »
This was established in the rules.

Which part? It doesn't go on to say that if you sign a guy during the season when it takes hold, and what the effect of the percentages will have. All we voted on, and passed, was that you can sign a guy after the season and it will take hold the following season. Also what was established was that once the season ends, you can still sign a player in his final year of eligibility to an extension. What is lacking in wording in regards to prior to that.

Now that we can sign players, and have the contract start the following season, we didn't discuss how this would effect the prospect extensions. When they were created, you could not sign a player for the following year, now you can.

If we are to be consistent with what we already voted on - #2 - then we should have prospect extension start the following season, just like any other extension. What this does is give GMs another year of control. Back to Ike, I sign him now, it starts next season in 2012, I control him now at 4 mil for the following 5 years. Or should we have to take the contract on that season? That is what I think we need to suss out.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2011, 08:06:44 PM »
For me, extension should be at the rate at the time the extension is announced, to take effect when the existing contract ends.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2011, 08:23:56 PM »
Yes but prospect contracts run for four years, that is the existing contract. Which is both way too complicated to keep track of, as well as unrealistic to have a guy for what could be nine years for a minimal amount.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2011, 08:28:42 PM »
Dan, you aren't seeing the big picture.  Term limits apply to prospect extensions.  Therefore, taking advantage of the prospect extension in 2011 for a P-2013 contract would only add three years under the prospect extension with the value taken as of 2011.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2011, 08:58:53 PM »
Dan, you aren't seeing the big picture.  Term limits apply to prospect extensions.  Therefore, taking advantage of the prospect extension in 2011 for a P-2013 contract would only add three years under the prospect extension with the value taken as of 2011.

I realize that, my question is when should they go into effect? Again back to Ike. I like talking in examples it is better to visualize. Now I signed him in 2011, he is P-2013. His 'discount' is 60% this year. My question is, given the same situation, given the new rules, would it take effect in 2012, and not 2011. Like our new rule pertaining to contract extensions. Would the new extension rule apply to prospect extensions. That is what I am trying to clarify.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2011, 09:56:39 PM »
A similar player to Ike would take effect 2014 and last through 2016.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2011, 10:31:03 PM »
Now I'm completely lost. Someone please explain it to me. The prospect extension rule is as such...

"Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension (see below), but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.  The resulting annual salary must be no less than $4m."

Now what am I missing? If you sign someone to a PE - it is for 5 years. Now that we are starting extensions the following year, do prospect extensions start immediately, next season, or at the end of the contract (which I honestly don't think is a consideration)?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: PM Davew
    May 19, 2024, 01:23:10 PM
  • dbreer23: Brian CLE PM
    May 19, 2024, 01:49:57 PM
  • Braves155: PM BAB
    May 19, 2024, 03:29:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Bayareaballers pm trade posted in fgm
    May 19, 2024, 03:56:17 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves ill send u message soon
    May 19, 2024, 03:56:32 PM
  • indiansnation: Dbreer23 pm
    May 19, 2024, 03:58:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    May 19, 2024, 04:35:11 PM
  • indiansnation: Watching boston kick the living crap out of cardinals
    May 19, 2024, 04:53:49 PM
  • Braves155: Great seeing the Knicks get schooled
    May 19, 2024, 06:37:35 PM
  • Rhino7: I agree, pacers will be a better match vs Celtics
    May 19, 2024, 07:02:21 PM
  • Braves155: But just like anytime Stephen A. gets hyped for the Knicks, they disappear in big games
    May 19, 2024, 07:08:00 PM
  • TheGOAT: Celtics would probably win it all
    May 19, 2024, 07:20:01 PM
  • Braves155: Looking forward to TWolves-Nuggets tonight
    May 19, 2024, 07:22:40 PM
  • TheGOAT: Around for trade talks in NFL Live
    May 19, 2024, 08:07:18 PM
  • Braves155: Likewise
    May 19, 2024, 08:22:40 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: What you looking for? @Thegoat?
    May 19, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • Rhino7: Down goes the Champs! Nuggs out
    May 19, 2024, 11:56:44 PM
  • Daddy: That Minnesota NBA LIVE team aint lookin too bad right now. Should be fun!
    Yesterday at 12:00:46 AM
  • Rhino7: Good team except the contracts
    Yesterday at 03:09:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve seen them? We havent completely structured all that yet. Weve got expansion and other factors that the real Wolves dont face.
    Yesterday at 03:39:40 PM
  • Daddy: My comment on the real Wolves are if they win a chip then there is no such things as bad contracts. The point of all contracts are to win Championships.
    Yesterday at 03:40:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: I will be around the rest of the day to talk deals. Tomorrow I will be around after work but plan on being in some spreadsheets most the day
    Yesterday at 05:04:22 PM
  • Rhino7: No, haven’t seen them except on spotrac
    Yesterday at 05:33:13 PM
  • Daddy: @Rhino7 the rumor is they've got a decent GM in both leagues. Especially NBA LIVE. (Howwwwwwwl)
    Yesterday at 07:13:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Vegas is ready to grab one of the players on the roster
    Yesterday at 07:17:34 PM
  • Daddy: Lol, Seattle too Im sure.:rofl:
    Yesterday at 07:43:10 PM
  • Daddy: I will leak this... Each team will be allowed to protect 5 and each team can only lose one player to expansion
    Yesterday at 07:44:21 PM
  • Daddy: 30 teams to draw from = 15 players each
    Yesterday at 07:44:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: Id also imagine trading and all that can happen. Like pick a guy to trade to another team to pick up other assets
    Yesterday at 07:45:25 PM
  • Daddy: You know LIVE rules. Once they are yours you can do whatever you like.
    Yesterday at 07:46:32 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah had to just check. So a deadline to select the keepers. Then a few days for the selection. Me and Seattle alternate picks?
    Yesterday at 07:47:47 PM
  • Daddy: The expansion draft is LIVE alternating picks until both teams have 15 players like the NBA All Star teams get picked.
    Yesterday at 07:48:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: oh Crap
    Yesterday at 07:49:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is interesting w my team
    Yesterday at 07:49:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: who to protect outside the obvious
    Yesterday at 07:49:52 PM
  • STLBlues91: Sounds good I didnt know if it would be like the NHL expansion with seattle where they get posted or live broadcasting
    Yesterday at 07:50:02 PM
  • Daddy: The "Expansion draft" will be a LIVE Event & followed by the Entry Draft where Vegas/Seattle also will start off with picks #1 & #2.
    Yesterday at 07:50:06 PM
  • Daddy: We doing BIG Crap with this basketball league. Buckle up!
    Yesterday at 07:50:46 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE is codenamed "The "Matrix" for all the numbers we running. Its currently being built.
    Yesterday at 07:52:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well I will get my roster breakdown before the live expansion since I am done working for the summer next Wednesday
    Yesterday at 08:01:38 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE will drop first. Hockey guys trade like crazy. Good luck. :)
    Yesterday at 08:12:04 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah working on that spreadsheet and a few fixes on it. May do some slight visual adds and then to NCAA football sheet which I got going as well
    Yesterday at 08:48:21 PM
  • Daddy: :toth: the best moderator team on the planet. Thanks! :toth:
    Yesterday at 09:14:11 PM
  • Daddy: Can you imagine a league(s).  Where EVERY player that becomes a professional has value.. and 30-32 teams have 30-32 different people are actively determining that value?
    Today at 01:46:50 AM
  • Daddy: Where you dont wait for trades to happen on scoring sites or SS updates and the only thing asked of you is to run your own franchise and see how good you are. On an EVEN playing field.
    Today at 01:48:59 AM
  • Daddy: Its already near impossible to get into NFL LIVE. We had to start up a 64 team league just to accommodate the waiting list. True Story.
    Today at 01:55:29 AM
  • Daddy: Once full. NBA, NHL, & NCAAs will be very difficult to get into. People dont just walk away from LIVE often and when they do... They usually want back in. Legit dont miss your team in your sports. Get them while you can.
    Today at 02:00:44 AM
  • IndianaBuc: RyanJames5 PM
    Today at 09:13:54 AM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys take a look at these baseball mugs
    Today at 01:53:49 PM
  • indiansnation: [link]
    Today at 01:53:56 PM