Author Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses  (Read 3191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2465
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2012, 05:32:48 PM »
I am skeptical that the new method will add any strategy, but I won't fight the majority.

I propose the following draft budgets based on the current rookie bonuses and the final 2012 standings.  There is no need to change both if we simply create draft budgets based on the current bonus levels.  For example, the Orioles budget should be enough to afford the 1st, 31st, 61st, and so on ranked players based on the current bonus levels.  We could build the Orioles budget as follows:

1st pick = 7m
31st = 1.5m
61st = 0.5m
91st = 0 (no bonus)

Therefore, the Orioles budget should be 9m.  I like dealing in round numbers, so we could give them a budget of an even 12m to allow for supplemental picks and players with higher bonuses than 1.5m slipping for the 31st pick.  To keep things simple and avoid creating individual budgets per team, I suggest 6 budget tiers based on the standings such as the following.

Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 12m
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 11m
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 10m
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 9m
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 8m
Tier 6 (1 through 5) = 7m

 

« Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 05:59:41 PM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #21 on: September 06, 2012, 05:56:08 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2465
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2012, 06:03:31 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.

Imo, we would be back to square one if we did that.  Teams like the Orioles and the Padres would have to choose between spending to become winners and saving money for the draft.  I thought that the whole premise to revamping the draft system was to allow the worst teams to sign the best players without compromising their major league salary cap.  I really don't want to re-visit this topic like IP for the next 3 years, LOL.  Would it not be better to have slightly inflated draft budgets?  Who would be harmed?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2012, 06:19:38 PM »
Roy your proposal would drive up the salary for major league players since everyone is getting a bonus. I would suggest a 5m bonus for the bltt 5 teams and a 2.5 bonus for 6 to 10. Teams can decide whether they want to blow it on one player or spread it out. Note that in your proposal the gap between tier 1 and 5 is also 5m
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2012, 06:40:19 PM »
I would say a 30% cut in Roy's prices is fair. Considering the first overall pick will get 7 mil, and that would take care of that teams entire draft budget.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2012, 06:43:58 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2465
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2012, 07:09:56 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

I think those numbers are a fair compromise between what Howe and I proposed.  I would like the others to digest this proposal, but barring any strenuous objections, I think we may be able to put this issue to bed. 

I would like to table the elimination of the EDR for now.  My brain can't take too much change right now, LOL.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #27 on: September 09, 2012, 02:18:09 AM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

Not a ec member, clearly, but I think this I think this is the most fair.  I agree with Howe's logic, and it is supported with this system suggested by Dan.  Potentially eliminate tier 6 and maybe 5?  Is that more in line with Howe?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #28 on: September 10, 2012, 11:27:53 PM »
Howe has shown that bonuses did not seem to have a huge impact on hitters this year, and many have devalued pitching so it is expected that they would be drafted later than BA/MLB with bonuses avoided.

I'm sticking to my guns with if it ain't broke don't fix it, I know some disagree but I personally think our current rules are fine and representative of MLB effects.  I vote for no change.


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2012, 09:37:09 AM »
Ben... You're not on the RC anymore... You were replaced in your absence by Freddy
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    May 04, 2024, 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    May 04, 2024, 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    May 04, 2024, 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    May 04, 2024, 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    May 04, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    May 04, 2024, 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Yesterday at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Yesterday at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Yesterday at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Yesterday at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Yesterday at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Yesterday at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Yesterday at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Yesterday at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Yesterday at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Yesterday at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Yesterday at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Yesterday at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Yesterday at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Yesterday at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Yesterday at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Yesterday at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Yesterday at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Yesterday at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Yesterday at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Yesterday at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Yesterday at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Yesterday at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Yesterday at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Yesterday at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Yesterday at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Yesterday at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Yesterday at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Yesterday at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Yesterday at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Yesterday at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Yesterday at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Yesterday at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Yesterday at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Yesterday at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Yesterday at 08:22:38 PM