It's a good point to make and as with most leagues here on profsl all teams/owners can jump into a trade review and post a veto (or yes vote) and rationale. If a veto is backed up with good facts and comments, it will stand and could lead to a Trade Veto or at least the trade being left open longer for more/all owners to review.

ultimately, I and other TC members will try not to impede an owner from building their franchise the way they want to... unless something just doesn't add up or cripples 1 team relative to another in a trade.

Is it so hard to hire GM s to run a team for you? Im not a fan of one guy running 2 teams but it may be necessary here? A league with the kind of cache as FNHL, guys should be begging to run a team for an owner.

I still  as the trade is fair for all 4 teams involved...at the end of the day I view my job as TC to look at the names in the trade, not the names of the trading parties. Also my job to make certain no team gets FUBAR...I see no FUBAR happening to any of the 4 teams involved.

The rules should state clearly about conflict of interest, but COI is not an indicator of cheating. There are 30 teams here and they all should be allowed to trade to each other, so long as there is no FUBAR.

Just my thoughts boys, i dont expect everyone to think alike, and diverse opinions are welcome.

 
4 team deal, but only 3 owners so i give it an asterisk* as far as the biggest fantasy trade...
Still,
3 way deals are super tough, especially since most TC's look for a loser.
There is no loser here.

 

 
BROAD ST. BULLIES

 
Johnny is putting in work on the Island 
Is it at the expense of Winnipeg?