0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm sorry I'm harping on this, if you guys disagree let me know. I'm just trying to explain my view, given I'm probably doing a Crapty job, so we can agree on the best way. I just want the league to be as accurate as possible, however I understand if you guys see things differently. I've been in both roto, head to head and points leagues... My strong preference is head to head, points leagues. I've been in a couple very competitive league for 5-6 years now and dropped the others.
I enjoy a basic 6 X 6 league and add in FLD % as well. R, HR, RBI, SB, AVG, OBPFLD %W SV, K/BB, ERA, WHIP, HLDI really like leagues with OBP and HLD you can easily find surprise sources of these stats, therefore evening the playing ground for Smaller Market teams.
You are not going to find those stats in this league. We may include them for reference only as I mentioned above with zero-weighted stats. We're looking for pure individual contributions to a team's run production / run prevention.
I'm on board with the reference statistics for sure... Other considerations for pitching scoring statistics could be ground balls, quality starts and innings pitched... Typically, with all other variables held constant (most importantly walks), ground ball and strike out pitchers perform best.
Yes, roughly. Values should be assigned to each so that pitching is roughly, on average 36-37% of a teams performance. Should I try to draft point values? Should we include quality starts and ground balls? Are there any other statistics, not mentioned in the formulas I listed that should be added?