Scoring Categories

[Canada8999]

Looks great Colby!

[mjmezzetti]

Looks great Colby!

Colby,
This looks great.  I think this is probably the best we can do.  Only outstanding questions how should we handle players that are eligible at a position they're no longer playing (i.e. of-eligible player playing ci/1b or rp-eligible sp, etc.)?

[Colby]

Colby,
This looks great.  I think this is probably the best we can do.  Only outstanding questions how should we handle players that are eligible at a position they're no longer playing (i.e. of-eligible player playing ci/1b or rp-eligible sp, etc.)?

Thanks MJ... That is next on this scoring categories hit list.  What Fantrax has to offer is fairly simply, but at least we can alter it.

Position Eligibility
Games needed for a player to qualify at a position from previous season: ___
Games needed for a player to qualify at a position from current season: ___

In 2009, we used 20 and 5 to determine positions.  I think 20 and 20 would work much better.
   

[Colby]

Of all of the pending RC issues, this one is the most important.  It appears that we are all in support of my revisions to MJ's work, so all that remains is the position eligibility.

[clidwin]

ill confirm 20:20

[lp815]

I'll confirm, well done gentlemen.

[Canada8999]

ill confirm 20:20

20/20 works for me.

[mjmezzetti]

20/20 works for me.

Is is possible to have a re-set midway through the season?  I think last season's 20 games eligibility should go away at some point.  I also think we'll have to keep an eye on this during the season as issues arise.  An of or c eligible first baseman could very easily become the most valuable player in the league.

[Colby]

Is is possible to have a re-set midway through the season?  I think last season's 20 games eligibility should go away at some point.  I also think we'll have to keep an eye on this during the season as issues arise.  An of or c eligible first baseman could very easily become the most valuable player in the league.

Settings can be changed mid-season, so this is something we could do.  If I picked a time in which last season's games do not count toward eligibility then I would pick the All-star break.

[Canada8999]

Do we really need this?  I think teams should be able to know what positions they can plan to start players at based on the previous season, and I don't think they should be penalized by players losing eligibility mid-season when it is much harder to make adjustments (MLB teams just tell the guy to switch positions, we don't have that luxury).