Author Topic: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade  (Read 687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vik

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« on: December 28, 2019, 05:51:41 PM »
Ducks trade:

Devan Dubnyk, $7.4m (2021-22)
Matt Villalta, N/C (0 games)
:ANA: Round 3

Blackhawks Trade:

Joe Pavelski, $5.5m (2019-20)
Ryan Reaves, $1.4m (2020-21)
Mathieu Perreault, $1.2m (2019-20)

Can never have enough depth at goalie so even though the contract is rough and has dealt with injuries lately I'm taking at shot on Dubnyk. Pavelski simply not producing this year and since I couldnt move him just for cap space/youth his deal makes sense.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Thecliff

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 6762
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • fantasy sports fanatic
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :DET-NBA:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2019, 10:07:08 PM »
:ANA: DUCKS confirm this trade. Heck, I hate losing and being 1-11 to start this season it is time to shake up my team so I can compete with the rest of league this year and hope for better start in 2020-21. Plans to make additional roster moves to follow as injuries too, have been a sword in my side all season long. Thanks Vik and good luck.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline izaman3

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5279
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2020, 12:19:03 PM »
 :veto:

This deal seems a little too lop-sided in Chicago's favor for me. Plus as it stands, Chicago is already at the goalie limit of 3, so I wouldn't be able to process this deal without another move.

Let's hear from some more GMs.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2020, 12:45:01 PM »
I thought deal was fair given Dubnyk's up and down and injury plagued season plus the fact he is on a massive contract.

My assumption was it would pass so made corresponding moves, however, miss read rules on Anderson so that's on me. Got another move that makes everything legal but at this point need to know verdict here before posting it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cloud91

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3640
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :ANA:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2020, 08:46:20 PM »
 :veto:
sorry to veto, but starting goalie is still gold and picks are golden gems in this league, and dubnyk is a 1st choice despite  he's performance this season. and also putting round 3 pick and villalta with dubnyk which is a goalie makes even more lopsided (its just my opinion), the 3 players in exchange for dubnyk are good but i feel you can get even more than them .
« Last Edit: January 07, 2020, 04:43:42 AM by cloud91 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:ANA: Title Town: NHL   :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2017-'18 Season
:PIT-NHL: King Of The Rink (NHL Yahoo GM) :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2014-'15 Season

Offline Thecliff

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 6762
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • fantasy sports fanatic
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :DET-NBA:
    • :DET-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2020, 01:52:06 AM »
Ok, 2 vetoes....will go a different route.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Ducks/Blackhawks Trade
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2020, 10:37:04 AM »
Is what is it is here, I might not agree but respect the voting process just a little surprised. Ducks were saving 6m and 7.4m in the next 2 year yearly respectively which is very valuable here. He also wanted some skaters so this deal made sense for both.

My only real issue here is the time it took to get a verdict, I know it's holiday season but around 10 days makes it tough for additional moves. I anticipated this would pass and made moves which now technically made my roster illegal. Can't do much to change this but will post to ensure roster is legal going forward.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    Yesterday at 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    Yesterday at 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    Yesterday at 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    Yesterday at 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    Yesterday at 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    Yesterday at 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    Yesterday at 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Today at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Today at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Today at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Today at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Today at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Today at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Today at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Today at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Today at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Today at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Today at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Today at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Today at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Today at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Today at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Today at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Today at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Today at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Today at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Today at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Today at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Today at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Today at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Today at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Today at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Today at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Today at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Today at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Today at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Today at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Today at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Today at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Today at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Today at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Today at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Today at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Today at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Today at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Today at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Today at 08:22:38 PM