Since I voted against internal transfers when previously presented, I think it's only appropriate for me to vote against both Option #1 and #2 in this second go round. All of us have witnessed the bad feelings that have been generated by the approval and denial of past transfers, and I think our league is better served by by putting an end to them. The subjective nature of Option #1 has yet to be clearly defined by any of its proponents. There are yes votes with stipulations, yet nothing concrete is really presented.
Is "for the bettement of the league" like MLB's "In the best interests of baseball", and therefore simply left to the interpretation of whomever is the Commissioner? Or the reigning members of the Rules Committee? Just seems too ambiguous for me.