Author Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses  (Read 3461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2484
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2012, 05:32:48 PM »
I am skeptical that the new method will add any strategy, but I won't fight the majority.

I propose the following draft budgets based on the current rookie bonuses and the final 2012 standings.  There is no need to change both if we simply create draft budgets based on the current bonus levels.  For example, the Orioles budget should be enough to afford the 1st, 31st, 61st, and so on ranked players based on the current bonus levels.  We could build the Orioles budget as follows:

1st pick = 7m
31st = 1.5m
61st = 0.5m
91st = 0 (no bonus)

Therefore, the Orioles budget should be 9m.  I like dealing in round numbers, so we could give them a budget of an even 12m to allow for supplemental picks and players with higher bonuses than 1.5m slipping for the 31st pick.  To keep things simple and avoid creating individual budgets per team, I suggest 6 budget tiers based on the standings such as the following.

Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 12m
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 11m
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 10m
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 9m
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 8m
Tier 6 (1 through 5) = 7m

 

« Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 05:59:41 PM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #21 on: September 06, 2012, 05:56:08 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2484
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2012, 06:03:31 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.

Imo, we would be back to square one if we did that.  Teams like the Orioles and the Padres would have to choose between spending to become winners and saving money for the draft.  I thought that the whole premise to revamping the draft system was to allow the worst teams to sign the best players without compromising their major league salary cap.  I really don't want to re-visit this topic like IP for the next 3 years, LOL.  Would it not be better to have slightly inflated draft budgets?  Who would be harmed?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2012, 06:19:38 PM »
Roy your proposal would drive up the salary for major league players since everyone is getting a bonus. I would suggest a 5m bonus for the bltt 5 teams and a 2.5 bonus for 6 to 10. Teams can decide whether they want to blow it on one player or spread it out. Note that in your proposal the gap between tier 1 and 5 is also 5m
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2012, 06:40:19 PM »
I would say a 30% cut in Roy's prices is fair. Considering the first overall pick will get 7 mil, and that would take care of that teams entire draft budget.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2012, 06:43:58 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2484
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2012, 07:09:56 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

I think those numbers are a fair compromise between what Howe and I proposed.  I would like the others to digest this proposal, but barring any strenuous objections, I think we may be able to put this issue to bed. 

I would like to table the elimination of the EDR for now.  My brain can't take too much change right now, LOL.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #27 on: September 09, 2012, 02:18:09 AM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

Not a ec member, clearly, but I think this I think this is the most fair.  I agree with Howe's logic, and it is supported with this system suggested by Dan.  Potentially eliminate tier 6 and maybe 5?  Is that more in line with Howe?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #28 on: September 10, 2012, 11:27:53 PM »
Howe has shown that bonuses did not seem to have a huge impact on hitters this year, and many have devalued pitching so it is expected that they would be drafted later than BA/MLB with bonuses avoided.

I'm sticking to my guns with if it ain't broke don't fix it, I know some disagree but I personally think our current rules are fine and representative of MLB effects.  I vote for no change.


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2012, 09:37:09 AM »
Ben... You're not on the RC anymore... You were replaced in your absence by Freddy
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Shot out to YURmom. The first female of LIVE as its only female LIVE GM. Thats a keeper @Mt_Crushmore! :toast:
    May 28, 2024, 09:23:01 PM
  • Daddy: #Chicks dig da dynasty
    May 28, 2024, 09:24:43 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to all actively bidding in the Nico Hoerner sweepstakes! [link] MLB LIVE never sleeps.
    May 28, 2024, 09:29:27 PM
  • Daddy: Shot out to @jmntl82 [link] congratulations on your first of many LIVE trades.
    May 28, 2024, 09:31:14 PM
  • Daddy: Well damn.. congratulations on your second trade in the last fifteen minutes. :rofl: Bartender i will have what he's having.
    May 28, 2024, 09:37:13 PM
  • IndianaBuc: I’ll have a double.
    May 28, 2024, 09:38:53 PM
  • jmntl82: Stay tuned, we're building something over here in Detroit
    May 28, 2024, 09:43:10 PM
  • Brent: PM sent Detroit
    May 28, 2024, 09:51:02 PM
  • Rhino7: Bartender pour me another :toast:
    May 28, 2024, 09:56:30 PM
  • Daddy: We are building something. In every sport. Non stop. Its what we do.
    May 28, 2024, 10:11:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yup, sometimes people dont see the vision. Sometimes the vision Fricks up. You dont know till the chips are cashed in
    May 28, 2024, 10:12:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I once traded a full draft class 1-7, an additional 1st, 3 offensive flyer players for what player you might ask?
    May 28, 2024, 10:13:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: WR Jalen Reagor lmaaooo  :rofl:
    May 28, 2024, 10:14:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And won my first chip that same season. Reagor starting in the flex scoring 9 points
    May 28, 2024, 10:14:39 PM
  • jmntl82: How did the other team finish?
    May 28, 2024, 10:16:01 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: It was dallas. I think he missed the playoffs that year. Then used the draft picks on the 2021 class. Every pick was the 32nd pick (dont remembee what the other 1st became)
    May 28, 2024, 10:18:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Idk if anyone remembers the 2021 class but it was weak on offense outside or the top 10-15. I dont regret the deal just learned and move on. As long as you have assets, you can mold your build how you want. Picks are usually the most valuable asset because most gms want in on a draft.
    May 28, 2024, 10:19:34 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The results of that draft class is here [link]
    May 28, 2024, 10:20:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Every 32 overall pick dallas makes in each round came from that trade
    May 28, 2024, 10:20:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The 2024 and 2025 classes look much more promising than that one lol
    May 28, 2024, 10:22:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: 2021 draft class was my worst class as a NFL Live gm. my 2022 and 2023 were better
    May 28, 2024, 10:32:52 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I think it was the worst for most of us. It was a bad class overall. The top was amazing tho
    May 28, 2024, 10:42:05 PM
  • jimw: Etienne is amazing. He was near the top of that draft lol
    May 28, 2024, 11:18:42 PM
  • Brent: I got Nico Collins at 26.
    May 28, 2024, 11:20:10 PM
  • Daddy: You can use his bat n glove.
    May 28, 2024, 11:41:35 PM
  • dbreer23: I'm having issues trying to access league SS using Google Sheets. Anyone else having problems?
    Yesterday at 12:32:38 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: :beer:
    Yesterday at 12:42:14 AM
  • Daddy: Which league SS
    Yesterday at 12:56:47 AM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE Buzz... "Tomas Hertl has just purchased land in the Delaware Valley. His agent suggests he loves Cheesesteaks
    Yesterday at 01:30:45 AM
  • dbreer23: All league SS
    Yesterday at 01:55:17 AM
  • dbreer23: which sucks bc I am headed out of town again tomorrow.
    Yesterday at 01:55:29 AM
  • dbreer23: I'll be back on Monday to get things back in order in all leagues.
    Yesterday at 02:00:12 AM
  • Daddy: Its local on your end @Dan
    Yesterday at 02:06:12 AM
  • Daddy: I can see them all.
    Yesterday at 02:06:47 AM
  • DaveW: safe travels Dan - I can also see the spreadsheets in both MLB Live and FGM
    Yesterday at 07:05:08 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: jmntl82 replied to your latest message
    Yesterday at 03:17:09 PM
  • jmntl82: posting now
    Yesterday at 03:23:08 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: sounds good
    Yesterday at 03:23:49 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Jmnt making moves
    Yesterday at 04:19:37 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: yes he has i got in the action
    Yesterday at 04:39:33 PM
  • Daddy: @NHL LIVE we think we may be ready to open. You may post roster moves and/or trades as we work to refine our processing.
    Yesterday at 05:10:44 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy, has ProFSL hired you as a spreadsheet guru yet? Or you decline cuz it didn't include benefits?
    Yesterday at 08:08:34 PM
  • Daddy: All i get is abused. They keep me in the basement and force me to watch foot commercials.
    Yesterday at 08:37:26 PM
  • Brent: Well that brings back memories when I was on the ProFSL staff and paid.
    Yesterday at 08:58:08 PM
  • Daddy: ProFSL has to be established by having great product or at least different product. We had the same old members. "Get off my lawn" types wanting to run leagues that were identical to the others. If you want 100 of the same old guys never chatting and no guests on the site. We had how many years of that?
    Yesterday at 09:12:05 PM
  • Daddy: If running a league is so hard, How can i run 6 of them? At the same time.
    Yesterday at 09:14:11 PM
  • Daddy: No moderators, no leagues, no leagues no traffic, no traffic no staff, no staff no profsl.
    Yesterday at 09:15:25 PM
  • Daddy: Its not as easy to find moderators. And if you are a moderator to come up with start up league concepts and do all that manual work. It takes a rare breed.
    Yesterday at 09:17:27 PM
  • Daddy: LM is the most thankless and simultaneously the most selfless thing anyone can do in this space. Thats why people dont do it.
    Yesterday at 09:19:05 PM
  • Daddy: So... Im training more of them. Powerhouse Baseball is an example of that. There are more leagues coming.
    Yesterday at 10:10:31 PM