VOTE: Restrict Resigning of Recently BO Player?

[SlackJack]

Would you like to close the loophole?

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=179731.0


VOTE TOTALS
6 teams voted YES, close loophole for same team to resign recently bought out player







10 teams voted NO, don't restrict buyouts players from being resigned by their recent owner.

[SlackJack]

Yes

[thunderblade]

Yes

[favo_zomg]

Yes

[jackdaniels]

No from Flames

[jackdaniels]

No from B's

[ripper]

Yes close it.

It's 1 Vote per GM not team.

Ripper

[PigsRule]

It's 1 Vote per GM not team.

Ripper

An owner that's paid for 2 franchise is limited to 1 vote?
Why?

This from an owner that hasn't paid his 5 bucks?

One vote per team is standard.

[Jonathan]

Can I get a more clear explanation of what is being voted on?

[PigsRule]

Would you like to close the loophole?

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=179731.0

It is NO for me because:

+ doesn't disadvantage or hurt any team competitively
+ is a rule open & available for all to use
+ allows for "cap correction" by budget strapped teams holding bad/inflated contracts
+ becomes anti-competitive to block 1 team from bidding in Free agency & an added admin step.