Author Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses  (Read 3361 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2479
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2012, 05:32:48 PM »
I am skeptical that the new method will add any strategy, but I won't fight the majority.

I propose the following draft budgets based on the current rookie bonuses and the final 2012 standings.  There is no need to change both if we simply create draft budgets based on the current bonus levels.  For example, the Orioles budget should be enough to afford the 1st, 31st, 61st, and so on ranked players based on the current bonus levels.  We could build the Orioles budget as follows:

1st pick = 7m
31st = 1.5m
61st = 0.5m
91st = 0 (no bonus)

Therefore, the Orioles budget should be 9m.  I like dealing in round numbers, so we could give them a budget of an even 12m to allow for supplemental picks and players with higher bonuses than 1.5m slipping for the 31st pick.  To keep things simple and avoid creating individual budgets per team, I suggest 6 budget tiers based on the standings such as the following.

Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 12m
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 11m
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 10m
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 9m
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 8m
Tier 6 (1 through 5) = 7m

 

« Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 05:59:41 PM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #21 on: September 06, 2012, 05:56:08 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2479
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2012, 06:03:31 PM »
I would probably cut those numbers in half. In my mind, the draft budget should be a supplement not a replacement for the draft fund a team has available.

Imo, we would be back to square one if we did that.  Teams like the Orioles and the Padres would have to choose between spending to become winners and saving money for the draft.  I thought that the whole premise to revamping the draft system was to allow the worst teams to sign the best players without compromising their major league salary cap.  I really don't want to re-visit this topic like IP for the next 3 years, LOL.  Would it not be better to have slightly inflated draft budgets?  Who would be harmed?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2012, 06:19:38 PM »
Roy your proposal would drive up the salary for major league players since everyone is getting a bonus. I would suggest a 5m bonus for the bltt 5 teams and a 2.5 bonus for 6 to 10. Teams can decide whether they want to blow it on one player or spread it out. Note that in your proposal the gap between tier 1 and 5 is also 5m
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2012, 06:40:19 PM »
I would say a 30% cut in Roy's prices is fair. Considering the first overall pick will get 7 mil, and that would take care of that teams entire draft budget.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2012, 06:43:58 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2479
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2012, 07:09:56 PM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

I think those numbers are a fair compromise between what Howe and I proposed.  I would like the others to digest this proposal, but barring any strenuous objections, I think we may be able to put this issue to bed. 

I would like to table the elimination of the EDR for now.  My brain can't take too much change right now, LOL.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #27 on: September 09, 2012, 02:18:09 AM »
Tier 1 (26 through 30) = 7
Tier 2 (21 through 25) = 6
Tier 3 (16 through 20) = 5
Tier 4 (11 through 15) = 4
Tier 5 (6 through 10) = 3
Tier 6 (1 through 5) =  2

Another thing I would like to suggest, and it was successful in Moneyball was an up and down minor league system. Allowing the movement of players from the 40 man to the minors (EDR) is an easy way of clearing cap without dropping players. And I know a few of us would like to replace some of the garbage in our EDR with what we consider useful prospects. Again just a suggestion.

Not a ec member, clearly, but I think this I think this is the most fair.  I agree with Howe's logic, and it is supported with this system suggested by Dan.  Potentially eliminate tier 6 and maybe 5?  Is that more in line with Howe?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Brewers GM

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #28 on: September 10, 2012, 11:27:53 PM »
Howe has shown that bonuses did not seem to have a huge impact on hitters this year, and many have devalued pitching so it is expected that they would be drafted later than BA/MLB with bonuses avoided.

I'm sticking to my guns with if it ain't broke don't fix it, I know some disagree but I personally think our current rules are fine and representative of MLB effects.  I vote for no change.


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2012, 09:37:09 AM »
Ben... You're not on the RC anymore... You were replaced in your absence by Freddy
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Thanks Brian. You've seen them all.
    Yesterday at 07:51:41 PM
  • Daddy: We're nearly completed.
    Yesterday at 07:55:40 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy you me & Brian gonna be at one each other a ton in hockey as I'm the Rangers in y'alls division
    Yesterday at 09:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: I must break you.
    Yesterday at 09:26:23 PM
  • STLBlues91: The guy that says that loses in the long run though...
    Yesterday at 09:39:42 PM
  • Braves155: To hell with all Philly sports teams. :rofl:   ☠️ #TRUTH
    Yesterday at 09:43:28 PM
  • Braves155: More importantly Mets suck
    Yesterday at 09:44:57 PM
  • Daddy: @Blues... Not this guy.
    Yesterday at 09:49:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: We shall see. May go fix some flyers cap hits real quick while i am at it.. They need a pay bump
    Yesterday at 09:51:07 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: quick question on nhl live
    Yesterday at 09:57:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: will there be a roster cleanup
    Yesterday at 09:57:44 PM
  • Daddy: What you talkin bout Willis?
    Yesterday at 09:58:35 PM
  • Daddy: Roster cleanup?
    Yesterday at 09:58:51 PM
  • Daddy: @STLBlues91 look at the NHL LIVE chat window please.
    Yesterday at 09:59:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Going there now
    Yesterday at 10:00:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: didnt you mention that some players on our roster have moved
    Yesterday at 10:00:14 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: will that need to eb accounted for
    Yesterday at 10:00:22 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB as per LIVE rules... All new ownership gets free drops year one.
    Yesterday at 10:00:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: or are they still ours
    Yesterday at 10:00:28 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that part i get
    Yesterday at 10:00:51 PM
  • Daddy: The rosters are set by a prior date not todays or tomorrows
    Yesterday at 10:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: If someone appears on your roster its because they are your player
    Yesterday at 10:01:21 PM
  • Daddy: Regardless of who they start the new season with.
    Yesterday at 10:01:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: are we allowed to post drops now or is that at a different time
    Yesterday at 10:02:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: last question
    Yesterday at 10:02:46 PM
  • Daddy: Only the newest NBA LIVE rosters are unknown as we will go with the newest version for the upcoming 2024/25 season.
    Yesterday at 10:02:54 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE you must wait.
    Yesterday at 10:03:15 PM
  • Daddy: It doesnt start till 6/1
    Yesterday at 10:03:28 PM
  • Daddy: We just work fast ;)
    Yesterday at 10:03:45 PM
  • Daddy: Looks like its ready but the SS isnt finished and we cant do transactions till we finish.
    Yesterday at 10:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: Its not like the others. Its got NHL/AHL and formulas need perfected.
    Yesterday at 10:04:56 PM
  • Daddy: A lot of LIVE GMs came after i had won in football and built a monster in baseball. Many of you weren't there for the start. Like STLBlues. Like Braves. So you talk smack to the old Man (me).
    Yesterday at 10:09:00 PM
  • Daddy: I cannot wait to start these virgin leagues. So that (you too BAB) can get your deserved foots from day one. :)
    Yesterday at 10:10:30 PM
  • Daddy: Size 13 (lubricant included sponsored by *Acme Bigfoot Jelly Inc)
    Yesterday at 10:12:47 PM
  • Brent: I don't know Hockey, but NHL Live sounds good.  I probably shouldn't have left FGM as I have a little more time than I thought after leaving a bunch of other leagues.
    Yesterday at 10:38:24 PM
  • STLBlues91: Think there are 3 more teams left until NHL gets filled up
    Yesterday at 10:40:10 PM
  • Daddy: Four (4) NY Islanders >> Nashville Predators >> Ottawa Senators >> LA Kings
    Yesterday at 10:50:47 PM
  • Daddy: They each had owners who uncommitted two of them went to other sites to try to copy the concept. Problem is no Daddy, no staff,  no LIVE.
    Yesterday at 10:52:54 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody on Earth does hockey like we are about to do it. Its a shame 28 teams are gone without most of the true profsl hockey guys signing up. That's a huge loss. For them.
    Yesterday at 10:54:45 PM
  • Daddy: If you love hockey and you love dynasty and you arent in LIVE than you must hate me or competition more than you love the others. Which is petty & not worth our efforts anyway.
    Yesterday at 10:56:10 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE Spreadsheet [link] should be available to be seen.
    Yesterday at 11:35:31 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent we sincerely hope that you do join as a HOF level dynasty GM. The rules and a lot of format carry over from one LIVE league to another.
    Yesterday at 11:56:46 PM
  • Daddy: We believe that even if you don't know a sport well, we provide the material, and enough guidance advice that any disadvantages are minimized. Hockey is one of the greatest sports of all time.
    Yesterday at 11:58:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Brent should I put you on the waiting list for the next opening?
    Today at 10:53:35 AM
  • Brent: Nah, I need to resist.  I built the team I wanted and decided to leave so that's on me.
    Today at 11:28:04 AM
  • indiansnation: Is their a way i can lgo and check out prospects in nhl live and get statistics
    Today at 01:02:05 PM
  • Daddy: We have the same prospects as real life. Same draft class coming in. You are loaded for Bear.
    Today at 01:06:11 PM
  • Daddy: The contracts that expire in 2023. Are upcoming FA. We giving a chance to extend 6/1
    Today at 01:08:31 PM
  • indiansnation: I finally looked at the minors and i got a 40 year old player in my minors
    Today at 01:27:00 PM
  • Daddy: Did we put Sidney Crosby in your Juniors? Whats the resolution you seek?
    Today at 01:57:39 PM