ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
Fantasy Leagues => Powerhouse: Transactions => Powerhouse => MLB Leagues => Powerhouse: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: indiansnation on August 10, 2020, 03:41:17 PM
-
Washington gets
OF Reynolds, Bryan, $0.3m (P-2022)
RP Nerris, Hector, $0.3m (2020)
OF Davis, Khris, $9m(2021)
SP Happ, J. A., $2m (2021) pd thru 2021
Cleveland gets
SS Mercado, Oscar, $0.3m (P-2022)
OF Harper, Bryce, $7.3m (2020)
-
Rockies agree. Been working on this trade know for a while to get this done i add reynolds to the deal and i get mercado back basicly swaping young of . Looking at 2019 stats this trade is pretty much even deal point wise. Im a big harper fan and hopefully this trade will get the deal done.
-
:veto: Sorry guys this isn’t anything different than the last offer you guys put out. Swapping Reynold and Mercado does nothing to sway the value in this deal so it puts us right back to where we were before.
-
:veto:
I'm feeling the same as MDA. The swap of Reynolds and Mercado doesn't change the deal at all. The value between the two is, as you stated in your reasoning, basically the same, so all you're doing is asking us to approve a trade we already vetoed.
-
i add reynolds to the deal and i get mercado back basicly swaping young of
Sorry Cliff & Brian...
:veto:
Echoing what MDA and RJ have said:
This is the same deal that has been vetoed already, just adding in 1 more piece on either side who wash each other out.
-
Ryan complained about point whise previous trade veto that he veto it because of points scored in 2019 i added reynolds to it to ballance trade out out and only reason i asked for the other of was because i figured it wouldnt go thru because score wise icliff got 5700 pts i would have got like 3500 but it doesnt matter so ill move on.
-
Disappointed....rules are rules.
HOWEVER.....the GMs did not let Cliff confirm, by jumping the gun. So the 3 vetoes should be scratched. AND in my book this trade is fair with prospect as Reynolds being added.
-
Disappointed....rules are rules.
HOWEVER.....the GMs did not let Cliff confirm, by jumping the gun. So the 3 vetoes should be scratched.
Maybe you're looking at another league's rulebook, DMarch.
I don't see anything in this one about both GM's needing to confirm before votes are cast:
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=287452.0
-
Disappointed....rules are rules.
HOWEVER.....the GMs did not let Cliff confirm, by jumping the gun. So the 3 vetoes should be scratched. AND in my book this trade is fair with prospect as Reynolds being added.
Since we can we eliminate votes? If anything I could see let’s hear Cliff’s reasoning and see if that changes my mind but Cliff hasn’t responded so our votes are void? Where you pulling that from?
-
I dont agree that cliff didnt get to respond to the trade before the vetos but rules stait that if there is 2 or more vetos than its veto then. I think we should alow both trade partners give a reason for the trade before u veto any trade thats all
-
Sorry, I was gone all day. Oh, yeah, this is BS. No way that this trade should be vetoed. By adding Reynolds this trade looks great by me. Thanks Dougie for stepping up. Yes, true, I never responded to confirm. I need to sleep on this.