0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I understand how many votes are needed to pass. My question is the reasoning for vetos. They are supposed to be used to make sure there is no collusion and that a trade does not hurt the league. This trade does neither of those. If we are voting on if we think a team should have gotten more in our opinion then its a whole different story. If that is the case then I will start to evaluate trades on if I think an owner could have gotten more of a return or not.
I have never looked at a trade that way in any league I have ever played in. Trades are suppose to be evaluated based on is there fair value. That is the main reason for voting on trades. Like I stated with my vote, I do not think fair value is given based on how scarce MI is and the high production of the MI's in question.
We can agree to disagree on your value assessment. But I do respect your vote.