Yeah, makes sense. The only concern is maybe that really by doing stats it may not show who has the best minor league system. It could just provide with who has the most balanced (i.e. having a guy at every position and depth with average prospects) rather than the team who has 7 top 100 prospects, 5 of which are pitchers. Obviously for trading, more people would go for the 7 top 100 guys rather than the average guys to make a "full" minor league roster.
Granted, if there was some sort of incentive for a strong minor league system overall, it could be cool. I love the thought, but if we're doing it simply to "rank" minor league systems, then I'm not so sure it'll accomplish that if we do it by stats. If proFSLs system works and it can run games or stats for minors, I'm all for it. I definitely think it would be a cool element to have, I just don't think it will effectively rank our minor league systems simply based on those results.