ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
Fantasy Leagues => Cross-Court Dynasty: Transactions => Cross-Court Dynasty => NBA Leagues => Cross-Court Dynasty: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: Daddy on November 02, 2020, 05:59:59 PM
-
76ers trade (the blessed bounty of):
1st rd pick 2020
2nd rd pick 2020
2nd rd pick 2021
2nd rd pick 2022
F Furkan Korkmaz $1.8m
Warriors trade:
PG Stephen Curry $30m (2022) *paid 2021
Now.....seeing as how I agreed to send only my first round pick which I HAD TO BE TALKED INTO by jojo a man you all know and respect.
I think given what Clay is SIMULTANEOUSLY being traded for...that my offer is more...very much more than generous for the novice and baby GM that is jojowalkwalk. The poor bastard I'm raping taking on Stephs $30m contract in a year (2022) I'm not sure he will even play.
If you mad you didn't get him...thats on you. Holla at me because I'm not in love with Steph and will move him.
Send me offers.
Thank you all
JoJo to confirm.
-
I agree to this revised bounty for Steph Curry. You guys are amazing. Thanks to Philly for this deal
-
:veto:
-
:veto:
What is your reason for veto?
-
Sorry but still :veto:
Reasoning stands from previous interations, as this deal still doesn't set a good precent.
Curry with more money paid should fetch more than Thompson (not same or even less depending on how you look at it).
If deal passes by others that's ok, but I just cant justify approving on my end.
-
Sorry but still :veto:
Reasoning stands from previous interations, as this deal still doesn't set a good precent.
Curry with more money paid should fetch more than Thompson (not same or even less depending on how you look at it).
If deal passes by others that's ok, but I just cant justify approving on my end.
Yeah I'm gonna agree to disagree. We go back a long time on profsl so I'm very surprised at you of all people taking this stance. Considering the trade you have on the board, in my view it's very hypocritical.
We are talking about the standard of vetoing. Just because you think my deal is less or greater than yours doesn't matter.
Every trade in this league has passed and yet as usual mine in so egregious that it sets the standard for a veto even when you just made a "very similar" trade.
Because in your mind Curry > Clay
Or
PG Nigel Williams-Goss $1.7m (2022)
SG Miye Oni $1.7m (2022) > Korkmaz
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=373301.msg1452444#new
Doesn't mean you get to defend your trade veto mine and tell me that's fair. Based on what standard? Klay Thompson is a HOF so is Steph. How you gonna make virtually the same deal and say mine is vetoable?
I'm not sure of the veto rules in this league yet but to me this is pretty foul. That other fool isn't even on the trade committee and proved himself to be a liar in the chat.
I'm sick of this double standard that only seems to apply to me.
It is a joke. :toast:
-
Yeah I'm gonna agree to disagree. We go back a long time on profsl so I'm very surprised at you of all people taking this stance. Considering the trade you have on the board, in my view it's very hypocritical.
We are talking about the standard of vetoing. Just because you think my deal is less or greater than yours doesn't matter.
Every trade in this league has passed and yet as usual mine in so egregious that it sets the standard for a veto even when you just made a "very similar" trade.
Because in your mind Curry > Clay
Or
PG Nigel Williams-Goss $1.7m (2022)
SG Miye Oni $1.7m (2022) > Korkmaz
Doesn't mean you get to defend your trade veto mine and tell me that's fair.
I'm not sure of the veto rules in this league yet but to me this is pretty foul. That other fool isn't even on the trade committee and proved himself to be a liar in the chat.
I'm sick of this double standard that only seems to apply to me. Its a joke.
Okay clown. Call me a liar lmao. Make a trade that’s halfway decent if you want it to be approved. And btw it’s KLAY. Not sure if you’re dyslexic or what’s going on there. For you to say Klay and Steph are similar in value is asinine. And by the way I’m still laughing at the “as usual mine is the only vetoable trade” so you make terrible, vetoable trades often then huh? I’m still not convinced that you aren’t just running both of these accounts and stacking one team. Earlier in the chat saying “we’ll take the trade” why would you say it like that? Do you answer for the Warriors or do you know he’ll accept because you’re running the team like you run your mouth? I tried to keep it civil and explain in the chat why I vetoed but you couldn’t accept it and had to call me names because you didn’t get your way.
If you think a pick in the late 20’s in a weak draft and 3 picks in the 50’s plus a d-leaguer are worth Steph fully paid then you’re just stupid. No way around it.
-
:iatp:
-
Going to have to veto this too - I have no horse in the race and the Warriors being weaker is better overall for my team but a first and three seconds is nothing for Steph when Derek Rose is going for two firsts
-
:iatp:
The deal itself is not great, but the two GM's are solid and have been on this site for a long time
-
Veto
I rarely veto trades.
Curry is worth a lot more than this especially when 1 season is being paid. Curry is a top 15 player, closer to top 10. If Derrick Rose at this point in his career goes for 2 1sts or Redick for a 1st, then Curry is definitely worth a ton more than a late first, 3 late 2nds, and Korkmaz (who isnt worth more than a 2 so really 4 2’s).
-
:veto:
As stated above a precedent has been set regarding the value of older players that still ball at a high level in regards to draft picks. Though the high salary is a turnoff and there is injury risk, the reward is also quite great if Curry plays like he has in the past. Curry should at the least receive two 1sts or a good young player in return. My return of Miles Bridges for Julius Randle was another precedent besides the Klay Thompson deal and Derek Rose. The Curry trade for 2nd round picks and a late 1st round in what is a weak draft class amount to a salary dump, which would be understandable, though still lopsided. Throwing in the payment of salary makes this deal even more lopsided than it already was and in veto territory. An more even trade that would still be lopsided, but not vetoable would be adding another 1st round pick or cancelling the payment of salary. Dumping older vets with plenty of value only makes sense if you get something in return, cap space for the bounty of free agency, high draft picks, or a massive salary dump. This trade accomplishes none of those goals thus giving it a veto.
PS - I don't take a veto lightly and have never vetoed a deal in my basketball dynasty league that I run that just finished it's 15th season this year.
-
Okay clown. Call me a liar lmao. Make a trade that’s halfway decent if you want it to be approved. And btw it’s KLAY. Not sure if you’re dyslexic or what’s going on there. For you to say Klay and Steph are similar in value is asinine. And by the way I’m still laughing at the “as usual mine is the only vetoable trade” so you make terrible, vetoable trades often then huh? I’m still not convinced that you aren’t just running both of these accounts and stacking one team. Earlier in the chat saying “we’ll take the trade” why would you say it like that? Do you answer for the Warriors or do you know he’ll accept because you’re running the team like you run your mouth? I tried to keep it civil and explain in the chat why I vetoed but you couldn’t accept it and had to call me names because you didn’t get your way.
If you think a pick in the late 20’s in a weak draft and 3 picks in the 50’s plus a d-leaguer are worth Steph fully paid then you’re just stupid. No way around it.
wow wow wow