Suggestion Box

[Drew]

This may just be me, but has it ever been considered to putting our actual names on our rosters?  I hate calling people iza, Slack or Mariner.  It may be nice to know people's actual names.  Again, if it's just me, then please ignore this!

First names are all right here: http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=33529.0

Or would you prefer they are on the main rosters?

[norrya66]

Umm no that's fine.  I didn't know they were there...I'll try to go there to look them up when I need them.  Thanks

[nelly85]

So any thoughts on increasing the goalie extensions since there way out of wack?

[SlackJack]

After watching all the deadline deals I'm of a mind to ask that we add a second year worth of draft picks to our trade-able assets. Sure would be nice to trade picks from the current season as well as the following.

[Tony]

After watching all the deadline deals I'm of a mind to ask that we add a second year worth of draft picks to our trade-able assets. Sure would be nice to trade picks from the current season as well as the following.

Would be cool but not a great idea. It would suck for new GMs taking over a team and a possibly of not having picks for 2 years.

[SlackJack]

Would be cool but not a great idea. It would suck for new GMs taking over a team and a possibly of not having picks for 2 years.

Mmmm....yes I suppose there is a risk with new GM's but I think it's on the TC to help mitigate and ensure they are not exploited. Not that any of our GM's would ever do that (#Letang). 

[Jesse]

I think that we should move the trade deadline to after the NHL trade deadline.

[Drew]

I think that we should move the trade deadline to after the NHL trade deadline.

Only problem with that is that our regular season is then basically over by the time the real deadline passes.

Mmmm....yes I suppose there is a risk with new GM's but I think it's on the TC to help mitigate and ensure they are not exploited. Not that any of our GM's would ever do that (#Letang). 

This is why I would be opposed as a GM could say hey I am going for it this year and make a good move with some future picks but then bail out and a new GM doesn't want the team because of the lack of ability to build.

[favo_zomg]

Then again, look at what hockeyfreak47 has done with Dallas in a year. It took him some time, but I definitely feel that he set that franchise up for the long haul.

[SlackJack]

Only problem with that is that our regular season is then basically over by the time the real deadline passes.
This is why I would be opposed as a GM could say hey I am going for it this year and make a good move with some future picks but then bail out and a new GM doesn't want the team because of the lack of ability to build.

Upon further reflection.