Author Topic: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)  (Read 1601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:29:44 PM »
Since I am posting on changes for 2015 I thought I would post my proposal for changes to the EDR.

The current size of the EDR in FGM is 20 players. The only way for a player to be placed on the EDR is for that team to draft that player in the annual FGM draft.

My proposed changes to the EDR are:

1. Increase the size of the EDR to 30 players.

This change is proposed because larger EDR's will help rebuilding teams. My goal for this would be that teams that are rebuilding would be able to have more prospects in their EDR's which would allow them roster more MLB players on their 40 man rosters.

2. Allow International Free Agents under the age of 18 (Age when signed by FGM team) to be placed on a teams EDR.

Currently in FGM international players aren't typically signed for a while because they have to be rostered on a teams 40 man roster. This rule would increase the value of International FA players and help rebuilding teams sign them without wasting a roster spot on their 40 man roster. I would limit the age to 18 so that teams must sign players when they are younger so that the purpose of the EDR doesn't change (Provide incentive to teams that use the "farm" to build for long term).

3. Allow players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded.

I brought up this rule for discussion because I have had people ask me about this. I'm not sure if I am in favor of this or not but It would help teams that are trying to rebuild use the EDR more effectively and not waste roster spots on their 40 man rosters.

RC members please discuss these potential changes. Feel free to list which ones you are for/against or feel free to suggest any other changes you think might be wise to make.

Shooter
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2014, 04:51:31 PM »
As far as increasing the EDR size to 30, I would be in favor of it.  With 10 rounds of drafts each year and it usually takes 3-5 years I think that an increase in size would be beneficial to the league.  I would vote for an EDR increase.

I also would vote to allow international free agents to be placed on a teams EDR.  Especially ones under the age of 18 years old.  I shy away from signing those young players as they will sit on my 40 man roster for a while.

I would also vote to allow players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded.  I think this is a no brainer. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2014, 06:29:41 PM »
Yes, yes, no
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2014, 07:16:54 PM »
After reading, and considering the merits of BHows' post below, I am modifying my previous post to keep things as they are in regards to the size of our EDR rosters. I vote to keep the EDR rosters at 20.

With the increase of the EDR roster to 30, I would also be in favor of allowing international free agents to be on our EDR rosters.  With our present set-up, it's tough to have a young player, who is years away from contributing to your team, on your 40 man roster. I support allowing International Free Agents under the age of 18 (Age when signed by FGM team) to be placed on a teams EDR.

Allowing players on one teams EDR to be placed on another teams EDR when traded is something I've supported since coming into the league.  Look at how many teams, who are not competitive, have their 40 man rosters filled with players who should be EDRs.  Like papps, I also think this is a no brainer. I support allowing players on one team's EDR to be placed on another team's EDR when traded.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 12:15:10 PM by Flash »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline VolsRaysBucs

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3677
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :ORL:
    • :TBL:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2014, 10:19:31 AM »
In my opinion, all three of these proposals are no-brainers...I vote a big fat YES to all 3!  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2014, 10:37:46 AM »

I'm not sure that we need to increase the EDR size. My concern is the unexpected side-effects to the FA pool. One of the things that keeps people interested during the season is the possibility of finding  "lightening in a bottle".
Every year we have a 10 round FYPD and statistics show that we all have players currently on our EDR that will, more than likely, never see a MLB pitch.
From Bleacher Report:
"only 66 percent of first-round picks play in the major leagues."
"For those players drafted in the second round of the draft, the chances of reaching the major leagues drops to 49 percent."
"Rounds 3-5 are a major turning point where the odds begin to drastically decrease, as only 32 percent of players drafted reach the majors."
"And the likelihood of playing in the major leagues continues to worsen, as only 20 percent of players drafted in Rounds 6-10 reach The Show."

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1219356-examining-the-percentage-of-mlb-draft-picks-that-reach-the-major-leagues

I would rather keep the EDR at 20 and if you decide to sign a player without having an available EDR spot, drop a player.

I have long been a proponent of allowing traded EDR player be allowed to be placed on the EDR of the acquiring team's EDR and I don't have any issues with Point #2
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2014, 12:08:04 PM »
I'm not sure that we need to increase the EDR size. My concern is the unexpected side-effects to the FA pool. One of the things that keeps people interested during the season is the possibility of finding  "lightening in a bottle".
Every year we have a 10 round FYPD and statistics show that we all have players currently on our EDR that will, more than likely, never see a MLB pitch.
From Bleacher Report:
"only 66 percent of first-round picks play in the major leagues."
"For those players drafted in the second round of the draft, the chances of reaching the major leagues drops to 49 percent."
"Rounds 3-5 are a major turning point where the odds begin to drastically decrease, as only 32 percent of players drafted reach the majors."
"And the likelihood of playing in the major leagues continues to worsen, as only 20 percent of players drafted in Rounds 6-10 reach The Show."

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1219356-examining-the-percentage-of-mlb-draft-picks-that-reach-the-major-leagues

I would rather keep the EDR at 20 and if you decide to sign a player without having an available EDR spot, drop a player.

I have long been a proponent of allowing traded EDR player be allowed to be placed on the EDR of the acquiring team's EDR and I don't have any issues with Point #2

BHows' points about keeping the EDRs at 20 are very noteworthy.  I never really considered that we would be taking 300 players out of the free agent pool if we increase the EDR roster to 30.  Since we are discussing the matter, and after thinking it over, I agree with BHows and support keeping the EDR rosters at 20. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2014, 12:14:41 PM »
If it does come down to keeping the EDR at 20 then why don't we look at reducing the amount of rounds in the draft from 10 to maybe 7?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2014, 05:38:01 PM »
The intention of increasing the EDR would be to allow teams to build through the draft more effectively. Players take 3-5 years to develop in the minor leagues so more roster spots gives teams longer looks at players.

The additional roster spots will also allow more teams to roster marginal MLB players and should increase parity across the league. Currently rebuildling teams tend to sign a prospect over a part time MLB player because there is more longterm value to their team if the prospect pans out. I would much rather see the Phillies (Not picking on your team just using it as an example papps) be able to sign more MLB players and not have an entire roster of prospects when rebuilding.

I also don't see this killing the FA market that much. Yes additional players will be owned in the EDR but the only way to get on the EDR is being taken in the Draft or as a very young International player. There will still be tons of in season "surprise" players that will be available on the FA Market. The in season signings are usually players that were lower drafted players who are a little old for prospects and over achieve there projected outcome for a year or two. These players are not likely to be on an EDR in FGM.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Brent

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 15350
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NO:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LouisianaState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on EDR Changes (RC Members only please)
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2014, 07:51:51 PM »
I'm not on the RC so I can't vote, but this concerns the league and GMs should be heard.

We don't really have a 20 player minors roster since the EDR is very strict and built through the entry draft only.  BHOWs posted the %'s of who actually makes it and I think that proves the complete opposite point of his.  The current state of most teams EDRs is a joke as most players are never going to make it to the show.  If the EDR is expanded with even some slight changes to the rules of who is allowed on the EDR or change it to a real Minors roster then, IMO, the league will be better off.  I do know that there are some original FGM GMs in the league and they want it to be different from the other leagues and that is cool as well, but the current state of this league doesn't really allow for teams to rebuild and become relevant in a short time.  Traded EDRs should be able to go on the new teams EDR the fact that currently isn't allowed is baffling. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SEA: 2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
:NOP: 2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
:NO: 2021-2022 NFL Live -  30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
:NO: 2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Yesterday at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Yesterday at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Yesterday at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Yesterday at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Yesterday at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Yesterday at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Yesterday at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Yesterday at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Yesterday at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Yesterday at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Yesterday at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Yesterday at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Yesterday at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Yesterday at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Yesterday at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Yesterday at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Yesterday at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Yesterday at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Yesterday at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Yesterday at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Yesterday at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Yesterday at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Yesterday at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Yesterday at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Yesterday at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Yesterday at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Yesterday at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Yesterday at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Yesterday at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Yesterday at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Yesterday at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Yesterday at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Yesterday at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Yesterday at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Yesterday at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Yesterday at 06:21:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I could teach how I did what I did
    Yesterday at 07:33:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: ill be around for a few hours today. Wont be around tomorrow until late
    Yesterday at 07:37:07 PM
  • TheGOAT: Thank God that there are 3 really good qb options in the draft. Can't imagine a world with Bo Nix as my frachise qb
    Yesterday at 08:12:51 PM
  • TheGOAT: Not that hes bad
    Yesterday at 08:13:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: think rn my qb room is minshew dobbs wentz
    Yesterday at 08:22:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: We look forward to your return to the playoffs @Thegoat
    Yesterday at 08:22:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You and your brother camw in guns blazing a few years back. The NFC is not the gauntlet the AFC is. Once you make the title game, all bets are off
    Yesterday at 08:23:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nfc is still tough
    Yesterday at 08:25:23 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i had a tough road
    Yesterday at 08:25:37 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: to get to teh ship lot of good teams i knocked out
    Yesterday at 08:25:50 PM
  • Brent: Carr is OTB for those who don't want a rookie.
    Today at 08:17:12 AM
  • Daddy: The NHL LIVE sign up sheet in the bullpen has nearly 87,000 views. Which is insane.
    Today at 11:47:58 AM
  • Daddy: Whats more insane is we still have 3 open teams
    Today at 11:48:37 AM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE [link] start new, start from today, sign up.
    Today at 11:49:27 AM