Mike Stanton on waivers?

[Fitzy1962]

You folks veto'd a trade offer I made to the Indians because you all said I didn't offer enough "value" in-return.

Now I've seen that the Indians simply released him and he was picked-up by the Giants for nothing in-return to the Indians.

Is that correct?

[snbts]

Please see note on your trade.

 

[yahoolando]

Because it was a NL/AL deal the player needs to be released and then picked up. All fantrax does is score the league. The transactions are all done on the boards. The Indians did not release Stanton to waivers.

[Fitzy1962]

Yeah, whatever.

[Fitzy1962]

Bunch of BS. I offered way more value than what he got. Take a look at the two offers now and tell me who offered more value for Mike Stanton?

Bunch of BS.

[firemanx]

I like castro a 100% over stubbs

[Fitzy1962]

Uhmmm...there was also 4 top 10 prospects including Chris Archer and 3 others and  a 3rd-round draft pick.

Castro sucks. If he wasn't a short-stop no one would think about him twice and he's regressing each year.

I  got screwed out of a deal that probably saved my season. And there was also collusion.
No way he clears waivers  without being claimed without collusion.

You all just pulled that move off so the trade couldn't be voted on and veto'd.

[yahoolando]

Its a dead issue.  Its over.

Please just let it go.