1
Cross-Court Dynasty: Invalid Transactions / Re: 76ers & Golden State (revised)
« on: November 02, 2020, 11:44:20 PM »Yeah I'm gonna agree to disagree. We go back a long time on profsl so I'm very surprised at you of all people taking this stance. Considering the trade you have on the board, in my view it's very hypocritical.
We are talking about the standard of vetoing. Just because you think my deal is less or greater than yours doesn't matter.
Every trade in this league has passed and yet as usual mine in so egregious that it sets the standard for a veto even when you just made a "very similar" trade.
Because in your mind Curry > Clay
Or
PG Nigel Williams-Goss $1.7m (2022)
SG Miye Oni $1.7m (2022) > Korkmaz
Doesn't mean you get to defend your trade veto mine and tell me that's fair.
I'm not sure of the veto rules in this league yet but to me this is pretty foul. That other fool isn't even on the trade committee and proved himself to be a liar in the chat.
I'm sick of this double standard that only seems to apply to me. Its a joke.
Okay clown. Call me a liar lmao. Make a trade that’s halfway decent if you want it to be approved. And btw it’s KLAY. Not sure if you’re dyslexic or what’s going on there. For you to say Klay and Steph are similar in value is asinine. And by the way I’m still laughing at the “as usual mine is the only vetoable trade” so you make terrible, vetoable trades often then huh? I’m still not convinced that you aren’t just running both of these accounts and stacking one team. Earlier in the chat saying “we’ll take the trade” why would you say it like that? Do you answer for the Warriors or do you know he’ll accept because you’re running the team like you run your mouth? I tried to keep it civil and explain in the chat why I vetoed but you couldn’t accept it and had to call me names because you didn’t get your way.
If you think a pick in the late 20’s in a weak draft and 3 picks in the 50’s plus a d-leaguer are worth Steph fully paid then you’re just stupid. No way around it.