Author Topic: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades  (Read 537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« on: January 14, 2015, 04:58:39 PM »
Here are the last 4 trades to be vetoed and the points these players have put up this season.

#1
Edmonton sends:
Daniel Alfredsson, $2.7m (2013-14) <-- retired
Kris Letang, $3.5m (2013-14) <- 83.6 (2.26 pts/game)

Winnipeg sends:
Tyler Johnson, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 98.35 (2.29 pts/game)
Alexandre Burrows, $3.6m (2014-15) <--- 46.05 (1.28 pts/game)
Justin Schultz, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 47.35 (1.1 pts/game)
Keith Yandle, $3.3m (2014-15) <--- 65.2 (1.55 pts/game)

Great veto by the TC. Looking back at only 1 year and this would have been a major loss for Winnipeg. The only player remaining on Winnipeg is Johnson though but he is the best producer (but surprised he is producing so well this season). Letang was also traded to Winnipeg in a re-worked deal that included Yandle and Schultz so all in all was a good trade but required Letang to be re-signed.

#2
To LA
Winnipeg 2
Winnipeg 3
Winnipeg 4
Winnipeg 5
Semin, Alexander LW,RW <-- 14.2 (0.57 pts/game)
Tyler Toffoli C RW <-- 67.25 (1.64 pts/game)

To Winnipeg
Kessel, Phil RW <-- 89.35 (2.08 pts/game)

Looking back if we knew Semin's production was going to take such a steep drop this deal actually would have been OK but the problem lies in the simple number of draft picks that were to be traded. Toffoli, I believe was playing at a higher rate but still seemed bad at time but much better now.

#3
To Anaheim
Round 1 (DALLAS) - Michael Dal Colle, LW
Round 1 (MINN) - Nikolaj Ehlers, LW
Round 2 (Vancouver) - Linus Ullmark, G
Mason Raymond, $2.0m (2013-14) <-- 22.6 (1.03 pts/game)
Niklas Hjalmarsson, $1.4m (2014-15) <-- 37.95 (0.88 pts/game)
Nick Bjugstad, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 73.9 (1.8 pts/game)

for

To LA
Jhonas Enroth, $1.2m (2014-15) <-- 139 (4.79 pts/game)
Zach Bogosian, $3.2m (2015-16) <-- 38.7 (1.33 pts/game)
Cedrick Desjardins, $0.2m (2013-14) <-- 0
:ANA: Round 4

This one is debatable now. Enroth is the starter in Buffalo but he is the starter in Buffalo and for how long! The two picks were 5th and 7th overall so good players were available there. Bjugstad has been good but was also still traded in another deal to Anaheim. The other two players in the deal are more of cap players. Bogosian is the next best player in the deal so although LA would have gotten a goalie and a solid defender, the reason was the potential of those two first round picks, along with a Buffalo goalie. I believe Gilly would have been better if this deal went through but that is also because he traded the picks and Bjugstad off in other deals.
P.S. - The number of players that Gilly has had on his team and then traded is insane. If you were to compile the players that he has had, you could easily make an all-star team. I believe but correct me that he has had Ovechkin and Crosby to name two superstars.

#4
:LAK: receives:

Brooks Laich, $3.6m (2013-14) <-- 35.05 (1.3 pts/game)
Colin Greening, $4.0m (2013-14) <-- 14.65 (0.73 pts/game)
Erik Gustafsson, $0.5m (2014-15) <-- 0
Michal Neuvirth, $1.6m (2014-15) <-- 71.5 (4.21 pts/game)

:WAS-NHL: receives:

Evgeni Malkin, $8.7m (2013-14) <-- 92.85 (2.21 pts/game)
Lauri Korpikoski, $1.5m (2013-14) <-- 38.1 (1 pts/game)
Niklas Hjalmarsson, $1.4m (2014-15) <-- 37.95 (0.88 pts/game)
:MIN-NHL: Round 4

Another great veto by the TC. Neuvirth is the backup (again in Buffalo). If both of these trades went through Gilly would be in the same situation as Washington but still not a "top" team. Malkin is the top player even if he is not a goalie and to include sending the other two would have hurt LA. The players LA would have received are garbage through and through. Although Malkin was indeed sent to Washington in another deal but not nearly as bad as this one.


Sorry Gilly if this seems like I am picking on you, these were just the last 4 deals to be vetoed when I went back to do this after I thought of the idea.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5153
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2015, 07:04:11 PM »
Excellent read....thanks Drew!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Jwalk100

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 4023
  • Bonus inPoints: 69
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :WH:
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2015, 08:55:43 PM »
Here are the last 4 trades to be vetoed and the points these players have put up this season.

#1
Edmonton sends:
Daniel Alfredsson, $2.7m (2013-14) <-- retired
Kris Letang, $3.5m (2013-14) <- 83.6 (2.26 pts/game)

Winnipeg sends:
Tyler Johnson, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 98.35 (2.29 pts/game)
Alexandre Burrows, $3.6m (2014-15) <--- 46.05 (1.28 pts/game)
Justin Schultz, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 47.35 (1.1 pts/game)
Keith Yandle, $3.3m (2014-15) <--- 65.2 (1.55 pts/game)

Great veto by the TC. Looking back at only 1 year and this would have been a major loss for Winnipeg. The only player remaining on Winnipeg is Johnson though but he is the best producer (but surprised he is producing so well this season). Letang was also traded to Winnipeg in a re-worked deal that included Yandle and Schultz so all in all was a good trade but required Letang to be re-signed.

#2
To LA
Winnipeg 2
Winnipeg 3
Winnipeg 4
Winnipeg 5
Semin, Alexander LW,RW <-- 14.2 (0.57 pts/game)
Tyler Toffoli C RW <-- 67.25 (1.64 pts/game)

To Winnipeg
Kessel, Phil RW <-- 89.35 (2.08 pts/game)

Looking back if we knew Semin's production was going to take such a steep drop this deal actually would have been OK but the problem lies in the simple number of draft picks that were to be traded. Toffoli, I believe was playing at a higher rate but still seemed bad at time but much better now.

#3
To Anaheim
Round 1 (DALLAS) - Michael Dal Colle, LW
Round 1 (MINN) - Nikolaj Ehlers, LW
Round 2 (Vancouver) - Linus Ullmark, G
Mason Raymond, $2.0m (2013-14) <-- 22.6 (1.03 pts/game)
Niklas Hjalmarsson, $1.4m (2014-15) <-- 37.95 (0.88 pts/game)
Nick Bjugstad, $0.2m (2014-15) <-- 73.9 (1.8 pts/game)

for

To LA
Jhonas Enroth, $1.2m (2014-15) <-- 139 (4.79 pts/game)
Zach Bogosian, $3.2m (2015-16) <-- 38.7 (1.33 pts/game)
Cedrick Desjardins, $0.2m (2013-14) <-- 0
:ANA: Round 4

This one is debatable now. Enroth is the starter in Buffalo but he is the starter in Buffalo and for how long! The two picks were 5th and 7th overall so good players were available there. Bjugstad has been good but was also still traded in another deal to Anaheim. The other two players in the deal are more of cap players. Bogosian is the next best player in the deal so although LA would have gotten a goalie and a solid defender, the reason was the potential of those two first round picks, along with a Buffalo goalie. I believe Gilly would have been better if this deal went through but that is also because he traded the picks and Bjugstad off in other deals.
P.S. - The number of players that Gilly has had on his team and then traded is insane. If you were to compile the players that he has had, you could easily make an all-star team. I believe but correct me that he has had Ovechkin and Crosby to name two superstars.

#4
:LAK: receives:

Brooks Laich, $3.6m (2013-14) <-- 35.05 (1.3 pts/game)
Colin Greening, $4.0m (2013-14) <-- 14.65 (0.73 pts/game)
Erik Gustafsson, $0.5m (2014-15) <-- 0
Michal Neuvirth, $1.6m (2014-15) <-- 71.5 (4.21 pts/game)

:WAS-NHL: receives:

Evgeni Malkin, $8.7m (2013-14) <-- 92.85 (2.21 pts/game)
Lauri Korpikoski, $1.5m (2013-14) <-- 38.1 (1 pts/game)
Niklas Hjalmarsson, $1.4m (2014-15) <-- 37.95 (0.88 pts/game)
:MIN-NHL: Round 4

Another great veto by the TC. Neuvirth is the backup (again in Buffalo). If both of these trades went through Gilly would be in the same situation as Washington but still not a "top" team. Malkin is the top player even if he is not a goalie and to include sending the other two would have hurt LA. The players LA would have received are garbage through and through. Although Malkin was indeed sent to Washington in another deal but not nearly as bad as this one.


Sorry Gilly if this seems like I am picking on you, these were just the last 4 deals to be vetoed when I went back to do this after I thought of the idea.


 

:iatp:

"Sometimes the best trade is the one you never made." Bill Veeck
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Tyler

  • Guest
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2015, 08:06:06 AM »
 :iatp:

Good stuff Drew.... Great group here so not a lot of vetoed trades, but good to see the TC steps in when absolutely necessary
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline norrya66

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2015, 07:47:31 PM »
I love going back in my spare time and looking at all of the trades.  I think it's a lot of fun to see deals that happened months or years ago and see how they panned out.

Great read Drew!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win:  2013-14 NHL Casino Champion

Offline Gilly

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 18345
  • Bonus inPoints: 5
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2015, 06:03:41 PM »
hahahaha poor Gilly, I keep it interesting here lol
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Gilly

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 18345
  • Bonus inPoints: 5
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting Look Back - Vetoed Trades
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2015, 06:06:13 PM »
One thing tho, #4 I think might be the worst deal I ever did or tried to do, I don't even want to remember what I ended up doing.

I also don't want to speak of Ovie/Crosby when I had both at same time as my therapist says its better to not talk about it, lolol
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    May 04, 2024, 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    May 04, 2024, 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    May 04, 2024, 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    May 04, 2024, 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    May 04, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    May 04, 2024, 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Yesterday at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Yesterday at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Yesterday at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Yesterday at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Yesterday at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Yesterday at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Yesterday at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Yesterday at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Yesterday at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Yesterday at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Yesterday at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Yesterday at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Yesterday at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Yesterday at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Yesterday at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Yesterday at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Yesterday at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Yesterday at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Yesterday at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Yesterday at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Yesterday at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Yesterday at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Yesterday at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Yesterday at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Yesterday at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Yesterday at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Yesterday at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Yesterday at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Yesterday at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Yesterday at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Yesterday at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Yesterday at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Yesterday at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Yesterday at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Yesterday at 08:22:38 PM