Author Topic: RC Discussion on Adding a 5 Player MiLB (RC Members Only Please)  (Read 2507 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on Adding a 5 Player MiLB (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2015, 07:39:16 PM »

Some questions I have regarding the 5 minor league spots are:
1. How will these roster positions be tracked?
2. Players placed on the minor league roster in Fantrax?
3. Will these players be added to the EDR roster on the PROFSL page?
4. Will they be clearly be identified?
5. What problems will this cause tracking Minor league players vs. EDR players?
6. Who can be placed on the minor league roster? Only players that have never played in an MLB Game? Players I have signed? Players I have traded for?
7. Does a player need to be removed once he plays in an MLB Game?
8. Would it be easier to implement, track and improve the league more by removing the EDR and going straight to a minor league roster (with eligibility requirements) where players can be called up/sent down?


1. How will these roster positions be tracked? 
The MiLB players will be identified with a date stamp similiar to what we use for signed Free Agents.

2. Players placed on the minor league roster in Fantrax?
Yes, we will expand the Fantrax Minor League roster to 25 and they will be there with our EDRs.

3. Will these players be added to the EDR roster on the PROFSL page?
Yes, they will be on the EDR roster with a date stamp label.

4. Will they be clearly be identified?
Yes, they will be identified with a date stamp label.

5. What problems will this cause tracking Minor league players vs. EDR players?
We don't envision any problems other than monitoring if a player passes the threshold.  If they are beyond the Prospect Threshold and on the three year cycle, they can remain on the EDR/MiLB roster, but once they are activated they cannot return.  A player beyond the threshold, cannot be "sent" to the minors, even if they are in the minors because they do not meet the criteria for a MiLB player.  The automatic activation rule for EDRs will no longer be in effect.

6. Who can be placed on the minor league roster? Only players that have never played in an MLB Game? Players I have signed? Players I have traded for?

These questions are answered by the original posted rule change.  It would apply to any player presently on your roster, acquired in trade, or acquired in the free agent auction.  But once again, here are the specific criteria for placing a player in one of the 5 MiLB roster spots:

Any player may be placed in the minors at any time, as long as they fall under the following requirements:

Determining rookie status:

- A player shall be considered a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has (a) played in 50 games (position player) or (b) accumulated 40 IP (pitcher) in the Major Leagues.

- A player that is over these limits is not eligible to be SENT to the Minors.  However, if a player already in the minors hits these limits he may remain in the minors indefinitely.  GM's are not forced to promote players that hit the threshold.  The limit is only for sending a player to the minors.

- A player must be on a P-20XX contract to be eligible.

- An MiLB player's contract would not count against the team salary cap.


7. Does a player need to be removed once he plays in an MLB Game?
To reiterate, the present EDR rule for immediate activation will no longer be used.  A player can remain on the EDR/MiLB roster as long as he is on a (P-20XX) contract.  If a player is on a (P-20XX) contract and is on the three year cycle because he is passed the threshold, he cannot be moved down, but if he is on the EDR/MiLB roster, he does not have to be activated.  It is a basic assumption that once a player is past the threshold, a GM will probably activate him at some point to help his team.

8. Would it be easier to implement, track and improve the league more by removing the EDR and going straight to a minor league roster (with eligibility requirements) where players can be called up/sent down?
Regardless of the answer, that is not the question before the Rules Committee. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline shooter47

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 4936
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :MIN-NHL:
    • :NorthDakotaState:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on Adding a 5 Player MiLB (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #21 on: January 23, 2015, 10:44:18 PM »
So this proposal would modify the existing EDR by adjusting the current requirement where players need to get called up when they make there MLB debut?

So basically we will have 25 spots. 20 EDR spots that can only be used for players we draft and 5 roster spots that can be used for any player that qualifies for the minor league requirements.

What's the reasoning for keeping the restrictions on the 20 EDR roster spots. Would it be less complex and easier for new GMs if we just went with a full 25 man minor league roster. It seems like this concept will be even more confusing to GMs then the current EDR. Personally I don't see a good reason to keep 20 roster spots as EDR spots.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2467
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Discussion on Adding a 5 Player MiLB (RC Members Only Please)
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2015, 02:38:00 PM »
After reading those complicated rules, I am even more convinced that eliminating the EDR altogether and setting up a format similar to Moneyball is the right way to go.

How is it this has worked so successfully in MB, yet I read that it would be difficult to implement in this league?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM
  • Daddy: I grew up watching The Rainman & The Glove. Welcome back to the NBA Seattle Supersonics. Ive missed ya.
    Today at 12:37:30 PM
  • OUDAN: Frick em, They are much better off in OKC
    Today at 12:54:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats cold :rofl:
    Today at 01:03:25 PM
  • Daddy: I should have known you jumped off the Lakers and on to the home state squad. We havent talked basketball much here like the old days.
    Today at 01:08:21 PM
  • Daddy: When Philly drafted Embiid that year we had LOR (Lord of the Rings) and we talked much hoops.
    Today at 01:10:18 PM
  • OUDAN: I refused before because of KD but this squad you cant help but love the way they play
    Today at 01:17:16 PM
  • OUDAN: Also I swear I enjoy fantasy basketball more than any other.
    Today at 01:20:09 PM
  • Daddy: Well you are Oklahoma Dan. Makes sense for you to love OKC & OU. Fricking Boomer Sooner!!!
    Today at 01:35:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Truth
    Today at 02:00:20 PM
  • Daddy: You are also top 5 in my All Time Greatest Fantasy GM ranking. We go back 14 years. If there is a Mount Rushmore for dynasty GMs. You Qualify.
    Today at 02:05:44 PM
  • Daddy: Thats also Truth. Ive seen them all.
    Today at 02:06:08 PM
  • OUDAN: Appreciate that man, Crazy how long some of us have been around here.
    Today at 02:15:49 PM
  • OUDAN: Crazy how long some of us have been on here
    Today at 02:15:58 PM
  • Daddy: I was hooked right away. Day 1 Scouting Department Baseball Milwaukee Brewers. Its like i was bit by a Vampire.
    Today at 02:26:34 PM
  • OUDAN: I miss when I cared enough about baseball to put the time in lol
    Today at 02:29:23 PM
  • Daddy: Fourteen years of learning. Ive seen leagues and sites fail and shutdown. Ive watched all the sites. All the leagues. People love to play for a buck.
    Today at 02:33:42 PM
  • OUDAN: I for sure prefer money leagues but yeah a lot have failed
    Today at 02:36:12 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody offered what i wanted. Just parts of it. Nobody did it completely right. They copied flawed concepts and theyve failed. 95% of all dynasty leagues fail.
    Today at 02:36:15 PM
  • Rhino7: OUDAN if you want OKC let me know, I’ll take a diff team. I’d like to compete against you more
    Today at 03:12:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Im in if thats an option
    Today at 04:00:45 PM
  • Rhino7: I’ll take Orlando if it’s not an issue
    Today at 04:08:55 PM
  • OUDAN: That would have been my 2nd choice
    Today at 04:15:52 PM
  • OUDAN: Thanks man for that swap
    Today at 04:16:52 PM