Author Topic: Draft question  (Read 3293 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2015, 04:07:16 PM »
The problem with qualifying offers is we are not negotiating with agents but ourselves. So we can pretty much say that every pending FA rejected the qualifying offer so I get compensation? I don't think that will work. For fantasy purposes I think the type A and type B is fine. I just think that type B picks come after the second round.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2015, 04:14:30 PM »
The problem with qualifying offers is we are not negotiating with agents but ourselves. So we can pretty much say that every pending FA rejected the qualifying offer so I get compensation? I don't think that will work. For fantasy purposes I think the type A and type B is fine. I just think that type B picks come after the second round.

True, but the QO would be an average from our league not MLB. i can't help but think that I may have been able to resign Miggy at a better rate under QO rules. I could be wrong, I'd have to research it further.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2015, 08:58:31 PM »
The problem with qualifying offers is we are not negotiating with agents but ourselves. So we can pretty much say that every pending FA rejected the qualifying offer so I get compensation? I don't think that will work. For fantasy purposes I think the type A and type B is fine. I just think that type B picks come after the second round.

Our use of Extension Values is our alternative to Qualifying Offers.  If we choose not to sign an impending Free Agent to an extension we are essentially declaring that our Qualifying Offer is being declined by our Free Agent.  I am not proposing the adoption of the QO's because it would make our Extension Value Scale obselete--and while it might allow for a lower extension for someone like Miguel Cabrera, it would inflate the contracts of the lower level free agents that we sign based on our Extension Value Scale.

The change would come in the compensation awarded.  Instead of awarding two picks for the loss of a Type A and one pick for a Type B free agent, we would only be awarding one pick for the loss of a Type A Free Agent and no picks for a Type B Free Agent.  With that, the pick would be in a Sandwich Round between the 1st and 2nd Rounds, with 1-15 1st round picks still being protected (and a sandwich pick awarded for 1-15) and the loss of a 1st Round pick.  No more getting two or more 1st round picks.  The team signing a Type A Free Agent loses their 1st round pick but it isn't given to the team from whom they signed their free agent.  With that, if a Type A player is received in a trade during the season, there is no compensation. 

Under our present system, a rebuilding team, with limited cap, usually loses in the process.  Look at the present draft. rebuilding teams like :SD:, :PIT:, :TOR:, :WAS: and :ARZ: get one pick in the first 66 players drafted because of our Compensation Rules.  I know that we can all work the system to our advantage, and I'm not criticizing those who have done so to improve their teams, but right now, there are 28 extra picks awarded because of our rules and I really think that it's time to revamp things to make it more in line with what MLB is doing.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline papps

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 8632
  • Bonus inPoints: 9
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2015, 09:12:10 PM »
I totally agree with your last post Flash!  :toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 - 2021 NFL Live Champion :TB-NFL:
🏆 - 2020 Bush League Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 Franchise GM Champion :PHI:
🏆 - 2018 The League Champion :PIT-NFL:
🏆 - 2016 Moneyball II Champion :BOS:
🏆 - 2010 Agents vs GMs Champion :PHI:

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2015, 09:22:54 PM »
Our use of Extension Values is our alternative to Qualifying Offers.  If we choose not to sign an impending Free Agent to an extension we are essentially declaring that our Qualifying Offer is being declined by our Free Agent.  I am not proposing the adoption of the QO's because it would make our Extension Value Scale obselete--and while it might allow for a lower extension for someone like Miguel Cabrera, it would inflate the contracts of the lower level free agents that we sign based on our Extension Value Scale.

The change would come in the compensation awarded.  Instead of awarding two picks for the loss of a Type A and one pick for a Type B free agent, we would only be awarding one pick for the loss of a Type A Free Agent and no picks for a Type B Free Agent.  With that, the pick would be in a Sandwich Round between the 1st and 2nd Rounds, with 1-15 1st round picks still being protected (and a sandwich pick awarded for 1-15) and the loss of a 1st Round pick.  No more getting two or more 1st round picks.  The team signing a Type A Free Agent loses their 1st round pick but it isn't given to the team from whom they signed their free agent.  With that, if a Type A player is received in a trade during the season, there is no compensation. 

Under our present system, a rebuilding team, with limited cap, usually loses in the process.  Look at the present draft. rebuilding teams like :SD:, :PIT:, :TOR:, :WAS: and :ARZ: get one pick in the first 66 players drafted because of our Compensation Rules.  I know that we can all work the system to our advantage, and I'm not criticizing those who have done so to improve their teams, but right now, there are 28 extra picks awarded because of our rules and I really think that it's time to revamp things to make it more in line with what MLB is doing.

It's going to take quite a bit of study. I think we are on the right track by limiting our Restricted RP to 12. We have already taken our Comp.Rd. from 36 this year to 17 next year. Brings it much more in line.
My first inclination is to place the Type A between the 1st and 2nd rounds and the Type B between the 2nd and 3rd. My concern in doing this is that we would be lowering the value of RP too much. This is already a "Hitter friendly" league, we don't want to make RPs obsolete.
Also, for the sake of realism, I think the QO option has some merit but perhaps so does baby steps toward that goal.
Whatever we end up with will be better than what we have and besides, it makes for good conversation
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

Eric

  • Guest
Re: Draft question
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2015, 12:43:33 AM »
I do think extension values are too much, but oh well. I dont wana devalue RP more than they are already. Pitchers usually get a bad name in here cause they make way less that hitters. I wish we could make them more valuable, but it is out of the question.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2015, 01:57:50 AM »
I do think extension values are too much, but oh well. I dont wana devalue RP more than they are already. Pitchers usually get a bad name in here cause they make way less that hitters. I wish we could make them more valuable, but it is out of the question.

Our 2016 extension values have actually dropped because they reflect the market values of the players on our rosters. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Eric

  • Guest
Re: Draft question
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2015, 02:13:39 AM »
:iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Draft question
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2015, 08:07:21 PM »
We are trying to emulate MLB as closely as possible so doing away with Comp picks is not realistic. A large portion of ours are RP so limiting them to twelve will go a long way toward rectifying the situation. Witness the fact that there were 36 Comp picks this year as opposed to 17 for next year's FYPD.
I like the idea of using the Qualifying Offer adopted by MLB. I think it's something we need to look into

You're emulating the one part (the draft) but not the part (the size of the minor league system) that enables the first part to do its job.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline BHows

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 12545
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :CIN-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Kentucky:
    • :CIN:
    • View Profile
Re: Draft question
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2015, 03:38:49 AM »
2016 Comp Eligible
Listed above are the compensation eligible Free Agents for 2016.
As you can see, by limiting the number of eligible RP's, we have substantially reduced the Comp Round. Personally, I think this is much more realistic.
(There is still a SP,RP issue. In this class Travis Wood is comp eligible but Aroldis Chapman isn't. That's separate problem we REALLY need to look into.)
Based on the above list I would go along with keeping Type A comp between Rounds 1 & 2 and moving Type B between Rounds 2 & 3 but that's off the top of my head. I think it is more in line with MLB and it would also address the issues Houston brought up
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 WCB2 Champions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: Via an accidental text from said person.
    May 15, 2024, 09:49:24 PM
  • dbreer23: It's a clear and quiet night in MLB LIVE, and the boards are cleared...
    May 15, 2024, 10:25:23 PM
  • Alpha5: If we could handle the money on fantrax that'd be great. Leaguesafe is actually the site I've been inquiring about
    Yesterday at 07:13:38 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Anyone know how to eliminate all the baseball news in unread topics and have football or hockey?
    Yesterday at 09:15:12 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Nevermind found it!
    Yesterday at 09:18:29 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Excited to see this news!!! Goff agreed to a four-year, $212 million contract extension with the Lions on Monday, Adam Schefter of ESPN reports.
    Yesterday at 09:23:51 AM
  • Daddy: He has two NFL LIVE Superbowl wins. The only two time champion.
    Yesterday at 11:59:49 AM
  • Rhino7: The GOAT lol
    Yesterday at 01:11:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'm ready for another SB rub
    Yesterday at 01:15:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: In NFL
    Yesterday at 01:15:35 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Where's all the Gm's other than the norm? Wake up!!! You got a team to run!!!. Let's trade, talk football, get tou FIRED up even though your last in your division.
    Yesterday at 04:22:12 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Any YouTube viewers watching dynasty draft? Any your subscribed to?
    Yesterday at 04:31:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM