1
Dynasty NHL / Re: Coyotes repeat!!!
« on: Today at 10:18:06 AM »
Nice win. See you again next season.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
Dynasty NHL / Re: Coyotes repeat!!!« on: Today at 10:18:06 AM »
Nice win. See you again next season.
2
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: Today at 10:16:15 AM »
Teams hold onto their picks now because they were really the one and only way to keep your team in competition as you were never going to be able to do it via FA. I think as teams re-adjust their strategies and FA becomes a bigger factor you will see guys more open to moving picks around and generating more trades. Especially if it gets harder to hold together your dynasty for longer term. GM's will have to "go for it" while their team is still in the hunt.
3
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 26, 2024, 10:00:20 AM »Referendum on "Dynasty" aside I think the changes we're talking about are minor but worth discussing. I am good with discussing but none of these changes even if agreed upon should happen immediately. Especially changes to extension rules. They should always be delayed by a season. 4
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 25, 2024, 11:57:09 AM »All this said, I am fine with the current setup. I like that players are getting too expensive to make the extend decision easily. What we may want to look into is there a way to tie our extension factor to total league production. For example this season there has been some crazy offense compared to others. Having the same multiple of 25000 with higher league production and static cap is making many players extension costs more than what is reasonable given our cap has not changed. Or alternatively maybe our cap number is based on total league production but we keep the extension factor of 25k the same. Just for curiosity I totaled the Fantasy points for all players in the 23/24 season and then did the same for 22/23 and 21/22. 23/24 season total was - 113912.95 x 25000 = 2,847,823,750 22/23 season total was - 114471.40 x 25000 = 2,861,785,000 (13,961,250 difference between 23/24) / 20 teams = 698,062.50 21/22 season total was - 113264.3 x 25000 = 2,831,607,500 This surprised me as i would have thought 23/24 would have been higher and the difference between the two is negligible. 23/24 season total was - 113912.95 x 20000 = 2,278,259,000 (569,564,750 difference when comparing multiples) / 20 teams = 28,478,237.50 22/23 season total was - 114471.40 x 20000 = 2,289,428,000 5
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 25, 2024, 10:02:12 AM »Might need to change the league name then no? Seriously I think there are other ways to encourage more turn-over. A cap on trading cash for example. Would like to hear more about your idea for extensions even if radical. I would agree with you on the cap for trading cash. There should be a max amount of additional cap a team can take on. I would say we disagree on the definition of dynasty. Dynasty for me is the ability to build and continue rebuilding my team to be competitive year in and year out while dealing with constant player movements/ changes. The dynasty part is me as a GM , not the players being able to stay on my team from draft to retirement. For the extension thing, i am not suggesting it for this league as it just wouldnt work. I will give you the real short of how its setup though. As a base line everything is managed by fantrax for contracts except for each team has 3 franchise tags to use per season. Contracts initial length is 3 years. Extension option year is after their 2nd year. You have the option to extend for 0, 1 or 2 years. Each year extended adds 1 million to the players salary contract. After the option year players are not eligible to be extended unless the GM uses 1 of their franchise tags. Franchise tags can be used to extend players for 1 or 2 more years. (each year extended would add 1 million to their contract). You can use a Franchise tag on a player more than once. So say you have connor mcdavid, starts as a rookie at 700k , you choose to extend him on your option year. for 2 years. His contract would move to 2.7mill. At year 5 his contract is expiring , you can tag him for another 2 years bringing him to 4.7, at year 7 you can tag him again bringing him to 6.7 and so on. What this does is each season teams end up with a mix of players that are on expiring contracts that they have to decide if they are getting too expensive or teams that have made moves to win that season end up with too many expiring contracts to extend all of them. (They always have to options to trade them after playoffs and before roster rollover.) Teams that are out of playoffs tend to look for trade partners for their expiring contracts. Teams in playoffs tend to take on expiring contracts as rentals knowing that those players will end up back in FA. This would not be possible to implement here since it would take way too many changes in all areas. Some aspects that maybe we could consider implementing - shorter term contracts. Extensions that dont go down in value. (if player A is at 5 mill per year, has a couple of injury years before extension they would need to be extended at the 5 mill at minimum even though they would extend at 3 mill on chart). Contracts that are considered final contracts (non extendable after they been extended once) Would need a Ftag option here as teams should always have some options at their disposal. Maybe a max amount of extensions per team. All this said, I am fine with the current setup. I like that players are getting too expensive to make the extend decision easily. What we may want to look into is there a way to tie our extension factor to total league production. For example this season there has been some crazy offense compared to others. Having the same multiple of 25000 with higher league production and static cap is making many players extension costs more than what is reasonable given our cap has not changed. Or alternatively maybe our cap number is based on total league production but we keep the extension factor of 25k the same. 6
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 24, 2024, 05:03:58 PM »
I dont think it has run long enough to really see the effect. two seasons is barely enough time to start seeing the ripple. I think the sluggish trade environment would only get worse lowering. If anything we need a bit less dynasty and bit more more turnover of players year to year. I pretty much support anything that pushes more players into free agency. My vote is to leave it alone for another season or two. I have my own ideas / preferences when it comes to extensions but my ideas would be seen as quite radical in the change section and far off the path that most leagues (all leagues) seem to use on profsl (I would love to divorce extensions from stats. Extensions should have their own mechanics). Although I will say they setup does produce way more movement (in a 16 team league we had close to 120 trades last season) 7
Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / Colorado buyouts« on: April 17, 2024, 10:13:53 AM »
Torey Krug, 3,300,000 x2 = 6.6mill
8
Dynasty NHL: History / Re: 2023/2024 Playoffs - Stanley Cup Finals!« on: April 10, 2024, 11:10:41 AM »
congrats guys , wish I could be there.
9
Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / Colorado buyouts« on: April 08, 2024, 02:51:43 PM »
Luke Schenn $1,254,000 * 2 = 2,508,000
Rasmus Ristolainen $1,056,000 * 2 = 2,112,000 10
Dynasty NHL: Invalid Transactions / Colorado IR move« on: April 02, 2024, 11:26:24 AM »
Move Gudas to IR he has been out since march 14th?
Gudas (upper body) did not travel with the team and won't play Tuesday versus Seattle, according to Derek Lee of The Sporting Tribune. Analysis If Gudas doesn't join the Ducks at some point during the team's five-game road trip, he could be out until April 5 versus the Kraken. The 33-year-old blueliner hasn't played since March 14 due to his upper-body issue. Gudas has compiled six goals, 16 points, 124 PIM, 142 blocked shots and 213 hits in 60 appearances this season. |
|