0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Your point is duly noted, though Rob could trade teams with 28 other owners if he was truly bored To clarify, we are voting on whether to allow internal transfers as a regular practice of filling team openings. In special cases, internal transfers may be approved, but that is NOT the context of the current vote.
The RC voted to limit internal transfers and allow them on a case-by-case basis. It appears there are two primary qualifications:1) A proven GM wants to downgrade by moving to a bad team in order to rebuild the franchise for the betterment of the league.2) A GM wants to move to their favorite franchise.In any case, your Dodgers application fails those two principals (which should go into the rules as the two key guidelines with acceptable internal transfers). Boston would be the likely choice for you, but that means nerwffej needs to have a qualifying transfer.
It's not an issue of a mid-stream change of protocol for hiring. With the questions surrounding how to fill the Dodgers, and all of the other teams that opened up in the past week, there was a clear need for direction. Roy put the hiring on hold, sought the RC for legislation, and now there is a clear direction (although more subjective than I anticipated).
Its a great rule. Roy and the RC handled it correctly and timely. The new rule is for the betterment of the league. Good job guys.
Yep. And proud that the RC made the right choice.
I thought you quit in a big huff and puff about the Dodgers situation?http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?action=post;quote=520465;topic=94699.0