Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Franchise GM
Wall of FGM Champions
|
Fantrax Page
|
Rulebook
|
Contracts
|
Extension Calculator
|
Transactions
|
Draft Room
|
Draft Order
|
|
|
|
PAPPS
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Down
Author
Topic: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses (Read 3147 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #10 on:
September 05, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
Changing my vote to #5.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #11 on:
September 05, 2012, 06:51:05 PM »
I could go with 5...so that's 3 for 5...out of 7 members....who has yet to vote?
Then we get then treat of discussing numbers
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2459
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #12 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:39:32 AM »
I believe that eliminating the bonuses would achieve the same objectives as # 5 without the burden of establishing draft budgets by team and tracking rookie bonuses. It seems as if the main objective is to get the top talent into the hands of the neediest teams without compromising their ability to compete in the regular season. I see no advantage to option # 5, because a reasonable draft budget would allow teams to afford the rookies they want regardless of bonus level. Some top prospects fell to the better teams this year, because some teams could not afford the rookie bonuses. Please let me know if I am missing something, because simpler is generally better, unless there is an advantage to draft budgets that I am missing.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:48:12 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
VolsRaysBucs
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3677
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #13 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:44:58 AM »
I'm good with #5 as well.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's not the deep water that drowns us...we die because we stop kicking.
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2459
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #14 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:51:24 AM »
To be clear, I would like someone to explain the practical advantages of # 5 over # 2. # 5 sounds good in theory, but the same objectives could be achieved by # 2 without the extra work of establishing draft budgets and tracking bonuses. A draft scenario comparing one option to the other would be ideal, because I don't see a difference between the two options and # 5 involves a lot more work.
«
Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 11:55:11 AM by rcankosy
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #15 on:
September 06, 2012, 11:55:37 AM »
I tend to agree Roy, but there seems to be a concesus of maintaing the bonuses. Giving teams a budget limit adds to the strategy of the draft. Again, I am fairly open to any of the suggestions on the board, but those are the positives that I can see coming from option 5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
h4cheng
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4198
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #16 on:
September 06, 2012, 12:00:55 PM »
#2 would eliminate any strategy besides picking the best player. With #5, teams would still need to take money into consideration which is more realistic. My vision of the draft budget would be a supplement. Teams are still welcome to spend regular cap space on the draft.
I think what #5 is doing essentially it to shrink the gap in cap space between big market and small team. A cleaner solution might be to bump up the cap space of smaller market teams so we dont have to keep track of 2 caps.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
rcankosy
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2459
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #17 on:
September 06, 2012, 03:02:51 PM »
I realize that we are trying to emulate real life, and a draft budget appears to add strategy, but I do not believe that it will. Let's take the Orioles as an example. We would need to give them a large enough budget to accommodate the best and 31st player available in the draft. Apply that same logic on down the line to the the other teams. The second you separate the draft budget from the regular one, all the teams would have funds readily available for the players that would probably fall to them in the draft. Where is the strategy assuming everyone drafts the best player available and they have the cap budget to do so? Again, it seems like a lot of work for nothing unless someone can provide a workable example of how the supposed strategy behind a draft budget would come into play.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Dan Wood
Guest
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #18 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:15:38 PM »
My thinking on it is as such...
Giving a team a draft budget (cap) that is all they would be allowed to spend in the draft, unless they wanted to spend some of their money and sign the player to a MLB contract, add that player to their 40 man, and not receive any benefits of having said player as a prospect (see Mike Trout as an example).
In my head #6 works better because that way the cap amount is fluid from season to season. ANd would emulate the way the Rays were built. High picks until they got good, then the gravy train runs out. The numbers I had more or less imagined were 10 mil for the lower end teams and 3 mil for the higher end (rich or playoff teams depending if we are talking 5 or 6) and 5 mil for the guys in between. Again the numbers can be finagled.
I tend to agree with Howe that #2 doesn't involve any strategy because of all of the auto picking that goes on here.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
mattpily
All-Star
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1060
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
«
Reply #19 on:
September 06, 2012, 04:18:12 PM »
I like option 5 and 6 but if I had to pick just 1 I would go with 6
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
RC Vote Needed for the Following Proposal on Rookie Bonsuses
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
Rob
:
Hopefully you're not what I think you are
Yesterday
at 01:46:33 PM
Rob
:
Which is, Zach Wilson.
Yesterday
at 01:46:38 PM
janesvilleaces
:
Daddy pm
Yesterday
at 01:54:14 PM
Renegade
:
So what’s happening
Yesterday
at 03:54:16 PM
Renegade
:
My 1st time playing college football fantasy
Yesterday
at 03:56:40 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
@Rob ive seen that take a few times. “Drake Maye=Zach Wilson”. Thats not how i see it. The Physical tools and demeanor alone are very different between the two. I like maye alot
Yesterday
at 03:58:58 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Are you a patriots fan @rob ?
Yesterday
at 03:59:21 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Jwalkejr88 pm
Yesterday
at 04:01:47 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
jwalkerjr88 replied back
Yesterday
at 04:18:37 PM
indiansnation
:
Good evening all which league we talking trade.
Yesterday
at 04:47:08 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
im nfl
Yesterday
at 04:47:43 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Understood BAB
Yesterday
at 05:00:25 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Always NFL Brian
Yesterday
at 05:00:36 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Yepp
Yesterday
at 05:06:57 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Can't wait to see the madness
Yesterday
at 05:10:27 PM
Daddy
:
God im sooooooo busy today. Im trying to get errands and profsl done before the draft
Yesterday
at 06:05:24 PM
Daddy
:
There is no way but im gonna keep at it.
Yesterday
at 06:06:27 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
as long as u r here for draft
Yesterday
at 06:08:49 PM
janesvilleaces
:
Go pack go
Yesterday
at 07:26:45 PM
Daddy
:
I thought i had converted you to a Ram fan by now @janes (insert eye emoji)
Yesterday
at 07:35:47 PM
Braves155
:
Sup guys
Yesterday
at 07:35:57 PM
Daddy
:
NFL DRAFT second only to the NFL LIVE Draft in entertainment!
Yesterday
at 08:52:12 PM
Daddy
:
8/1/24 8PM Change your NFL LIVE teams future with these guys right here!
Yesterday
at 08:52:53 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
Plan on it.
Yesterday
at 09:25:23 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Interesting developments so far. If you need a QB in NFL Live. Plenty of them have 1st round pedigree
Yesterday
at 10:53:26 PM
Daddy
:
NFL LIVE Draft Room
[link]
current picks, 2024 preview & history.
Yesterday
at 11:06:17 PM
Braves155
:
Daddy, what are your thoughts on the NFL Draft thus far?
Yesterday
at 11:34:39 PM
Braves155
:
Or anyone, what ya think?
Yesterday
at 11:35:07 PM
dbreer23
:
Vegeta100 PM
Yesterday
at 11:40:43 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Alot of surprised tonight as expected. Offensive heavy. 6 QBs in the 1st. 7 WRs. Fun night
Today
at 12:52:03 AM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Alot of NFL Live implications. Cant wait to see it unfold. On to night 2
Today
at 12:52:28 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
i wish we took cooper Frick
Today
at 01:05:02 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
we coulda waited on pearsall
Today
at 01:05:12 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
as much as i do like him a bit cuz he was dceent at ASU and solid at UF
Today
at 01:05:26 AM
Daddy
:
Who is cooper Frick? What position he play
Today
at 02:57:55 AM
Brent
:
BAB, yeah, Cooper is a beast.
Today
at 07:21:11 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
Daddy I was just expressing my displeasure that we passed on cooper dejean. I strongly felt cb was a bigger need or ol than wr
Today
at 10:28:14 AM
Daddy
:
I get it
Today
at 10:39:43 AM
Daddy
:
I dont understand everything i saw last night. The biggest winner to me was Gardner Minshew
Today
at 10:40:41 AM
Daddy
:
Raiders, Atlanta both should have traded back if they were gonna do what they did. IMO
Today
at 10:41:23 AM
Daddy
:
Atlanta could have fleeced Minny and let them draft JJ #6 then still get Penix before Denver/LV
Today
at 10:42:24 AM
Daddy
:
Its like Brian is running the Raiders.
Today
at 10:43:02 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
ya know what speaking of gardener I did trade for him this off-season
Today
at 10:46:49 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
I honestly wouldn't have minded pearsall but I saw him as a Rd 2 target not Rd 1. Great to see another former alumni join the niners.
Today
at 10:48:21 AM
Daddy
:
49ers made a smart pick IMO.
Today
at 02:25:27 PM
Daddy
:
Their WRs need contracts and Deebo has been used a lot for a guy his size already.
Today
at 02:26:18 PM
Daddy
:
They cant and wont keep them all beyond this year.
Today
at 02:27:17 PM
Daddy
:
Plenty of Defense left. Only 9 guys on D got drafted last night. NONE of them will be 1st rd picks in LIVE. In fact i dont think a D player gets drafted at all in LIVE till round 3.
Today
at 02:29:01 PM
Daddy
:
If you want a S or CB @BAB your Niners will get one.
Today
at 02:30:45 PM
Daddy
:
If anyone questions the potency or quality of Colorado marijuana, i got two words for you. Bo Nix
Today
at 02:32:52 PM