Author Topic: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12  (Read 1864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2012, 08:57:58 AM »
Pretty sure this was mainly a move by a commissioner to fire up some team and get the boards active. 

I personally dont mind a bit of trash talk, its fun, gets people active, holds some accountable, as long as its within reason.  keep the  :soapbox: out of it. 

I dont really agree with the list as some of the teams have appeared to me as the most active but I think pigs accomplished his goal here.  :toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2012, 10:49:52 AM »
guys, if anyone sees this as a personal "attack" on them... that wasn't the objective ... but before ppl sound off while standing on their soapbox, ask yourself whether you've missed several PMs + failed to answer direct and simple questions addressed to you.

i hope everyone here wants a strong league as much as i do where teams compete the whole yr + are accountable.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2012, 11:20:21 AM »
Totally agree. Because I chose not sign FA because there was noone there to over spend means Im a bad owner.
...


as commissioner of not 6 (as i posted) but 12 leagues (as you corrected in my post) what should a commissioner do about a team that...

-has only 15 of 30 roster spots filled since August 3, 2012
-sitting on $23 Million in available cap (ceiling of 70.3m)
-zero (0) Right Wingers in a league that starts 3 nightly
-all the best RW free agent signed (see FNHL FA Tracker pg)
-and hasnt responded to 2 PMs about participation
-fantrax timestamp shows a date of 04/28/10 12:32PM (not a typo, April 28, 2010)

in all honesty, i would welcome your input on this situation.


BTW, this is likely also the only league that doesn't post a roll-call thread. i'm here often enough to see who's active.  :toast:


...
And with topic, the topic about trade offers, we wonder why there is high turnover.

Look no further than this thread.

i'm a little surprised by this comment, Corey.

what's the reason for making this comment? you're associating a post joeshmoe made about negotiating in public with this thread i started about "Least involved teams in 2011-12" ... and commenting about turnover rate?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2012, 11:50:33 AM »
People are now way too sensitive.  This thread is fine, so wasn't the worst trade thread.  I'm sure other people had worse offers thrown their way and they should have shared them. 

Posting my thread, for clarification, was not an attempt to negotiate in public...I don't negotiate with people who honestly offer deals like that.  The purpose was so teams know not to send me absolutely ridiculous offers that only a ten year old would agree to.  It worked!

But in all reality, people are way way way to sensitive.

Nice article, IMHO, Pigs. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2012, 12:02:52 PM »
IMO, sometimes it's better to open the discussion up before the season truly gets underway.

that way we know where the teams + league as a whole stand. :toast:

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2012, 12:12:13 PM »
in the defense of Jonathan, a glut of money in FNHL doesnt really do you any good during our FA unless you are willing to over spend for any average to star players.   I still have lots of money but similar to Brian Burke I refuse to pay the crazy amounts to players.

Had I known , what I know now , I wouldnt have let some of the players I let go to FA , go to FA.

I agree, extending homegrown talent will use up your cap.  That's why I was so sad to see the disaster of dropping players that shouldn't have been.  It really screwed up the Bruins badly. 

That being said, if I have 30m in cap space I should be spending it in an attempt to better my standings.  Otherwise it looks like people are fishing for the top draft picks.

And lastly, wasn't there a salary cap floor?  Is that still in place?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2012, 12:18:42 PM »
I agree, extending homegrown talent will use up your cap.  That's why I was so sad to see the disaster of dropping players that shouldn't have been.  It really screwed up the Bruins badly. 

That being said, if I have 30m in cap space I should be spending it in an attempt to better my standings.  Otherwise it looks like people are fishing for the top draft picks.

And lastly, wasn't there a salary cap floor?  Is that still in place?

As usual, the rules were messed with, and without thought of how it affected the future.  Salary cap floors are a real thing in the NHL and were one of the best parts of this leagues creation.  If you have floors it keeps owners active too.  I would suggest the league look into putting this rule back on the books. 

Sometimes the rules were best as is.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    May 04, 2024, 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    May 04, 2024, 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    May 04, 2024, 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    May 04, 2024, 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    May 04, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    May 04, 2024, 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Yesterday at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Yesterday at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Yesterday at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Yesterday at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Yesterday at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Yesterday at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Yesterday at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Yesterday at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Yesterday at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Yesterday at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Yesterday at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Yesterday at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Yesterday at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Yesterday at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Yesterday at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Yesterday at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Yesterday at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Yesterday at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Yesterday at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Yesterday at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Yesterday at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Yesterday at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Yesterday at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Yesterday at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Yesterday at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Yesterday at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Yesterday at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Yesterday at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Yesterday at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Yesterday at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Yesterday at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Yesterday at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Yesterday at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Yesterday at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Yesterday at 08:22:38 PM