ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Archive => Backyard NHL => Archive => Backyard NHL: Archives => Topic started by: SlackJack on March 01, 2021, 06:21:29 PM

Title: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: SlackJack on March 01, 2021, 06:21:29 PM

$3m

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: jmtrops on March 04, 2021, 10:36:10 AM

contract

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: SlackJack on March 04, 2021, 03:36:39 PM

1YR

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: Vik on March 04, 2021, 03:45:07 PM

Not to make a big deal here but are we not sticking with timeline of dates?

If so these couple of FA posts should not be valid right now as I see this timeline for FA:

Free Agency Closed - February 26th @ 11:59pm
Free Agency Re-opened  - March 6th @ 12:00am
Free Agency Ends - March 21st @ 11:59pm


Also I believe in season extension deadline is tomorrow according to the dates, so might be worth shooting a quick PM reminder in case anyone is not aware of deadline but wants to get some guys extended now.

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: Tony on March 04, 2021, 09:11:52 PM

Quote from: Vik on March 04, 2021, 03:45:07 PM

Not to make a big deal here but are we not sticking with timeline of dates?

If so these couple of FA posts should not be valid right now as I see this timeline for FA:

Free Agency Closed - February 26th @ 11:59pm
Free Agency Re-opened  - March 6th @ 12:00am
Free Agency Ends - March 21st @ 11:59pm


Also I believe in season extension deadline is tomorrow according to the dates, so might be worth shooting a quick PM reminder in case anyone is not aware of deadline but wants to get some guys extended now.

:iatp:

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: winter on March 04, 2021, 10:10:22 PM

Quote from: Tony on March 04, 2021, 09:11:52 PM

:iatp:

 :iatp:

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: SlackJack on March 05, 2021, 12:20:58 PM

Obviously didn't see that schedule. Keep my bids open for the 6th (tomorrow).

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: jmtrops on March 05, 2021, 01:25:16 PM

thats an odd rule does anyone know why we pause FA for a week?

slack lets keep the thread clean repost it tomorrow.

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: SlackJack on March 05, 2021, 01:43:12 PM

Quote from: jmtrops on March 05, 2021, 01:25:16 PM

thats an odd rule does anyone know why we pause FA for a week?

slack lets keep the thread clean repost it tomorrow.

No problem on the re-post. Would like your question re: why FA pause for a week. Don't believe we've ever had that before and could be in error?

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: jmtrops on March 05, 2021, 02:11:10 PM

maybe Anthony knows

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: Vik on March 05, 2021, 02:32:10 PM

I was just going off by what is posted, I do think we had similar layout previous years but could be wrong don't remember off the top of my head. Just thought it makes sense to point out current layout this year either way. Guess honest mistake not much of an issue.

However, if we are going with this, then by the book Victor Rask who was processed should technically be reposted as well. I have no comish say here and overall things are smooth and we are good hands, plus running other leagues know the comish work can be grueling, so ultimately let jmtrops and Anthony handle things as they see fit. For what it's worth I would support removing the FA freeze for future years but also fine as is.

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: SlackJack on March 05, 2021, 02:56:53 PM

I'll be reposting for Rask too of course. Notice he is on my Roster but not making him active! Either way I trust you won't be competing with my bid if you are just pointing out for the sake of technicality as you say.  :rofl:

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: jmtrops on March 05, 2021, 03:11:21 PM

ok I took him off

Title: Re: Mats Zuccarello
Post by: Vik on March 05, 2021, 03:42:47 PM

Quote from: SlackJack on March 05, 2021, 02:56:53 PM

I'll be reposting for Rask too of course. Notice he is on my Roster but not making him active! Either way I trust you won't be competing with my bid if you are just pointing out for the sake of technicality as you say.  :rofl:

 :iatp: